Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 261:
Line 261: + + + +
Talk:Counterexamples to an Old Earth (view source)
Revision as of 14:02, September 24, 2016
, 14:02, September 24, 2016→Stalemate of scientific discoveries: new section
I accept the expansion of the universe is accelerating, but why should that mean the universe is only 6000 years old? It would be equally valid for it to be hundreds of thousands of years old. [[User:Richardm|Richardm]] ([[User talk:Richardm|talk]]) 09:54, 24 September 2016 (EDT)
I accept the expansion of the universe is accelerating, but why should that mean the universe is only 6000 years old? It would be equally valid for it to be hundreds of thousands of years old. [[User:Richardm|Richardm]] ([[User talk:Richardm|talk]]) 09:54, 24 September 2016 (EDT)
== Stalemate of scientific discoveries ==
The point about scientific discoveries in the last several decades does not make any sense as to why this suggests a young earth. Can someone please explain it better or I shall remove it.
(username removed)