Block, SkipCaptcha, Automoderated users, edit, rollback
5,023
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 265:
Line 265: + + + +
Talk:Counterexamples to an Old Earth (view source)
Revision as of 22:30, January 8, 2018
, 22:30, January 8, 2018→Based on erosion rates, Niagara Falls is known to be less than 15,000 years old, even as admitted by atheistic scientists who believe in an Old Earth: new section
The point about scientific discoveries in the last several decades does not make any sense as to why this suggests a young earth. Can someone please explain it better or I shall remove it.
The point about scientific discoveries in the last several decades does not make any sense as to why this suggests a young earth. Can someone please explain it better or I shall remove it.
== Based on erosion rates, Niagara Falls is known to be less than 15,000 years old, even as admitted by atheistic scientists who believe in an Old Earth ==
How is this a counterexample? Waterfalls are thought to be relatively young, compared with the lifetime of a river. And even an old earth is to be expected to have some young features as an old man can sprout a new pimple: that does not make him an adolescent again. --[[User:AugustO|AugustO]] ([[User talk:AugustO|talk]]) 17:30, 8 January 2018 (EST)