Changes

Jump to navigation Jump to search
Line 251: Line 251:     
The big bang theory is falsifiable as it makes predictions for abundances of elements and the cmbr. For evolution it is debatable but this article has nothing to do with evolution so I feel both of these should be removed. [[User:Richardm|Richardm]] ([[User talk:Richardm|talk]]) 13:16, 1 October 2016 (EDT)
 
The big bang theory is falsifiable as it makes predictions for abundances of elements and the cmbr. For evolution it is debatable but this article has nothing to do with evolution so I feel both of these should be removed. [[User:Richardm|Richardm]] ([[User talk:Richardm|talk]]) 13:16, 1 October 2016 (EDT)
 +
 +
:Fair enough, I changed it. I added the evolution part, because it is closely related to the Big Bang (historical science, non-observable, long ages, etc.), even if they are not the same theory. I will point out that Creation Science (maybe not that specific theory) is falsifiable as well.[https://answersingenesis.org/creation-science/successful-predictions-creation-scientists/]
Block, Siteadmin, SkipCaptcha, Upload, Automoderated users, Check users, delete, edit, move, oversight, protect, rollback, Administrators
51,035

edits

Navigation menu