Irenaeus, Siteadmin, Check users, oversight, Administrators
351,420
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 284:
Line 284: − +
→Terryeo appears to be a contentious problem editor on this subject
--[[User:JoyousOne|JoyousOne]] 08:51, 26 April 2007 (EDT)
--[[User:JoyousOne|JoyousOne]] 08:51, 26 April 2007 (EDT)
::::I gave Terryeo a warning at the [[Dianetics]] talk page for turning the article into a dianetics advertisement. If he keeps it up, there are going to be problems. Here was his version: http://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Dianetics&oldid=128508[[User:Conservative|Conservative]] 09:02, 26 April 2007 (EDT)
::::'''I gave Terryeo a warning at the [[Dianetics]] talk page for turning the article into a dianetics advertisement.''' If he keeps it up, there are going to be problems. Here was his version: http://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Dianetics&oldid=128508[[User:Conservative|Conservative]] 09:02, 26 April 2007 (EDT)
:His old version has that same style of writing that says nothing, despite having lots of words. It doesn't tell the reader anything.--[[User:JoyousOne|JoyousOne]] 09:13, 26 April 2007 (EDT)
:His old version has that same style of writing that says nothing, despite having lots of words. It doesn't tell the reader anything.--[[User:JoyousOne|JoyousOne]] 09:13, 26 April 2007 (EDT)
I have pointed out specifically, the problem with the photograph. It is not up to me, it is up to other people. [[User:JoyousOne]] considers my information about the photograph to be a legal threat. I made no threat, I pointed out the legal problems with a photograph of a trademark. If you all wish to talk about how Conservapedia should be aware of and follow the footsteps of Wikipedia, I'll be glad to talk about that, too. In no case have I tried to advertise, nor to convince anyone of what I know to be true. I place good information, attributed information on the page and attempt to keep criticsm and bias placed after the subject has been introduced. But I worked all day yesterday while many, many edits were made to this article, worked toward getting an even handed article that doesn't sound like clambake org. Now I am told that my editing is unwelcome. Happy Ho Ho's. [[User:Terryeo|Terryeo]] 09:36, 26 April 2007 (EDT)
I have pointed out specifically, the problem with the photograph. It is not up to me, it is up to other people. [[User:JoyousOne]] considers my information about the photograph to be a legal threat. I made no threat, I pointed out the legal problems with a photograph of a trademark. If you all wish to talk about how Conservapedia should be aware of and follow the footsteps of Wikipedia, I'll be glad to talk about that, too. In no case have I tried to advertise, nor to convince anyone of what I know to be true. I place good information, attributed information on the page and attempt to keep criticsm and bias placed after the subject has been introduced. But I worked all day yesterday while many, many edits were made to this article, worked toward getting an even handed article that doesn't sound like clambake org. Now I am told that my editing is unwelcome. Happy Ho Ho's. [[User:Terryeo|Terryeo]] 09:36, 26 April 2007 (EDT)