343
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 290:
Line 290: +
→Terryeo appears to be a contentious problem editor on this subject: Okay, -history tab-
:: "His old version" ???? I have edited that page only once. It was immediately reverted. By whom, you might wonder? Simply click the "history" tab at the top of any article to view every edit ever made to that page. You see who has made every edit and the result produced. [[User:Terryeo|Terryeo]] 10:01, 26 April 2007 (EDT)
:: "His old version" ???? I have edited that page only once. It was immediately reverted. By whom, you might wonder? Simply click the "history" tab at the top of any article to view every edit ever made to that page. You see who has made every edit and the result produced. [[User:Terryeo|Terryeo]] 10:01, 26 April 2007 (EDT)
:::I will clarify for you...as you implied, it was me. I, unlike others, have nothing to hide. It was the quality, not the quantity of the edits you made that were unacceptable.--[[User:JoyousOne|JoyousOne]] 10:03, 26 April 2007 (EDT)
:::I will clarify for you...as you implied, it was me. I, unlike others, have nothing to hide. It was the quality, not the quantity of the edits you made that were unacceptable.--[[User:JoyousOne|JoyousOne]] 10:03, 26 April 2007 (EDT)
:::: Again, I have edited the [[Dianetics]] article once and once only. Again, to see who edited and what they produced, simply click the "history" tab at the top of any article. [[User:Terryeo|Terryeo]] 10:10, 26 April 2007 (EDT)
I have pointed out specifically, the problem with the photograph. It is not up to me, it is up to other people. [[User:JoyousOne]] considers my information about the photograph to be a legal threat. I made no threat, I pointed out the legal problems with a photograph of a trademark. If you all wish to talk about how Conservapedia should be aware of and follow the footsteps of Wikipedia, I'll be glad to talk about that, too. In no case have I tried to advertise, nor to convince anyone of what I know to be true. I place good information, attributed information on the page and attempt to keep criticsm and bias placed after the subject has been introduced. But I worked all day yesterday while many, many edits were made to this article, worked toward getting an even handed article that doesn't sound like clambake org. Now I am told that my editing is unwelcome. Happy Ho Ho's. [[User:Terryeo|Terryeo]] 09:36, 26 April 2007 (EDT)
I have pointed out specifically, the problem with the photograph. It is not up to me, it is up to other people. [[User:JoyousOne]] considers my information about the photograph to be a legal threat. I made no threat, I pointed out the legal problems with a photograph of a trademark. If you all wish to talk about how Conservapedia should be aware of and follow the footsteps of Wikipedia, I'll be glad to talk about that, too. In no case have I tried to advertise, nor to convince anyone of what I know to be true. I place good information, attributed information on the page and attempt to keep criticsm and bias placed after the subject has been introduced. But I worked all day yesterday while many, many edits were made to this article, worked toward getting an even handed article that doesn't sound like clambake org. Now I am told that my editing is unwelcome. Happy Ho Ho's. [[User:Terryeo|Terryeo]] 09:36, 26 April 2007 (EDT)