1,106
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 277:
Line 277: + +
no edit summary
:See, this is one of the points where you use me, and reinforces some of my (admitted) preconceptions. Why fight a picture illustrating a gathering place for Scientologists? Why make legal threats. Something here does not make sense. When Christians feel under threat, we open our arms, and embrace those who would denigrate us. We don't sue them. In this case, there isn't even any attack on Scientology, just a picture of a building with the name on it. If you put up a sign on a public street and someone wants to take a picture and display it, so what?--[[User:JoyousOne|JoyousOne]] 07:50, 26 April 2007 (EDT)
:See, this is one of the points where you use me, and reinforces some of my (admitted) preconceptions. Why fight a picture illustrating a gathering place for Scientologists? Why make legal threats. Something here does not make sense. When Christians feel under threat, we open our arms, and embrace those who would denigrate us. We don't sue them. In this case, there isn't even any attack on Scientology, just a picture of a building with the name on it. If you put up a sign on a public street and someone wants to take a picture and display it, so what?--[[User:JoyousOne|JoyousOne]] 07:50, 26 April 2007 (EDT)
:Its still used on several pages at wikipedia, no one took it down because they decided this trademark argument was bunk there too. Not much else to say about it. [[User:Tmtoulouse|Tmtoulouse]] 12:17, 26 April 2007 (EDT)
== Terryeo appears to be a contentious problem editor on this subject ==
== Terryeo appears to be a contentious problem editor on this subject ==