Changes

Jump to navigation Jump to search
Line 8: Line 8:  
*You are right: for a fundamentalist, you reasons are compelling. But I cannot imagine that any catholic will be impressed by your reasoning - some points are very week (''Thus the passage should be interpreted as follows: “And I say also unto thee, That thou art Peter [a small stone], and upon this rock [Jesus referring to himself] I will build my church; and the gates of hell shall not prevail against it.” ''), some just insulting and historically incorrect ("''The doctrine of celibacy was created to allow priests to have homosexual and pedophilic activities.''")
 
*You are right: for a fundamentalist, you reasons are compelling. But I cannot imagine that any catholic will be impressed by your reasoning - some points are very week (''Thus the passage should be interpreted as follows: “And I say also unto thee, That thou art Peter [a small stone], and upon this rock [Jesus referring to himself] I will build my church; and the gates of hell shall not prevail against it.” ''), some just insulting and historically incorrect ("''The doctrine of celibacy was created to allow priests to have homosexual and pedophilic activities.''")
 
:--[[User:AugustO|AugustO]] ([[User talk:AugustO|talk]]) 09:57, 22 November 2016 (EST)
 
:--[[User:AugustO|AugustO]] ([[User talk:AugustO|talk]]) 09:57, 22 November 2016 (EST)
 +
::When one does a Google search, the discription of Conservapedia under the link literally says "Wiki encyclopaedia with articles written from a Christian fundamentalist viewpoint." I support the article and I support moving it to "Essay:" as that is clearly the most appropriate action. --[[User:1990'sguy|1990'sguy]] ([[User talk:1990'sguy|talk]]) 10:19, 22 November 2016 (EST)
Block, Siteadmin, SkipCaptcha, Upload, Automoderated users, Check users, delete, edit, move, oversight, protect, rollback, Administrators
51,035

edits

Navigation menu