Irenaeus, Siteadmin, Check users, oversight, Administrators
351,620
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 6:
Line 6: + + +
Talk:Conservative of the Year 2016 (view source)
Revision as of 21:57, December 24, 2016
, 21:57, December 24, 2016→Pros and Cons of the two finalists
:The [[Nobel Prize]] was wrongfully given by [[liberals]] to [[Barack Obama]] for merely winning an election. Should the standards of ''Conservapedia'' fall to that low level of liberals??--[[User:Aschlafly|Andy Schlafly]] ([[User talk:Aschlafly|talk]]) 00:19, 24 December 2016 (EST)
:The [[Nobel Prize]] was wrongfully given by [[liberals]] to [[Barack Obama]] for merely winning an election. Should the standards of ''Conservapedia'' fall to that low level of liberals??--[[User:Aschlafly|Andy Schlafly]] ([[User talk:Aschlafly|talk]]) 00:19, 24 December 2016 (EST)
::Trump holds many conservative positions and right of center positions. He has been a tremendous ally of conservatives and moved the nation in a more conservative direction than many leading conservatives. He is probably going to move the Supreme Court to the right. At the same time, his views on homosexuality are not conservative. In terms of reducing the Federal deficit, like [[Ronald Reagan]], he may fall short in this area.
::In short, Trump is not a conservative. He is a right of center politician and businessman. Therefore, [[Phyllis Schlafly]] should be the Conservapedia's Conservative of the Year in 2016. [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] ([[User talk:Conservative|talk]]) 16:57, 24 December 2016 (EST)