Block, Siteadmin, SkipCaptcha, Upload, Automoderated users, Check users, delete, edit, move, oversight, protect, rollback, Administrators
51,035
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 131:
Line 131: +
Conservapedia:Community Portal (view source)
Revision as of 20:37, December 29, 2016
, 20:37, December 29, 2016→Was Hitler a Catholic?
::::Also, because so many Roman Catholics edit CP, I should make myself clear that I have nothing against Catholics or Mormons, and I think many of them are great people. I say what I say not to bash them but to point out that many of their doctrines are false and unbiblical. --[[User:1990'sguy|1990'sguy]] ([[User talk:1990'sguy|talk]]) 13:16, 29 December 2016 (EST)
::::Also, because so many Roman Catholics edit CP, I should make myself clear that I have nothing against Catholics or Mormons, and I think many of them are great people. I say what I say not to bash them but to point out that many of their doctrines are false and unbiblical. --[[User:1990'sguy|1990'sguy]] ([[User talk:1990'sguy|talk]]) 13:16, 29 December 2016 (EST)
:::::I also enjoy working with Catholics and Mormons. I find religion to be very deep and textured. At this point in my life, when I look back at all of the decisions and judgments that I have made, I no longer can tell where religion ends and my personal ethics takes over -- everything was baked together. I think that wikis or general encyclopedias are not suited for religious teaching or debate. So, I cringe when I read the stuff on [[Liberal myths]] and [[Christian In Name Only]]. It is like trying to publish a book called "Religion for Dummies." [[User:JDano|JDano]] ([[User talk:JDano|talk]]) 14:00, 29 December 2016 (EST)
:::::I also enjoy working with Catholics and Mormons. I find religion to be very deep and textured. At this point in my life, when I look back at all of the decisions and judgments that I have made, I no longer can tell where religion ends and my personal ethics takes over -- everything was baked together. I think that wikis or general encyclopedias are not suited for religious teaching or debate. So, I cringe when I read the stuff on [[Liberal myths]] and [[Christian In Name Only]]. It is like trying to publish a book called "Religion for Dummies." [[User:JDano|JDano]] ([[User talk:JDano|talk]]) 14:00, 29 December 2016 (EST)
::::::Yes, it can be a problem when people with very different theological beliefs (despite the same political and cultural views) edit articles like that. I do think, however, that both Roman Catholics and Protestants have no problem with the material on "Liberal myths." I could be wrong, but the XINO article seems to have been quite stable over the years, which is quite remarkable, considering the disagreements of our editors. --[[User:1990'sguy|1990'sguy]] ([[User talk:1990'sguy|talk]]) 15:37, 29 December 2016 (EST)