Changes

Jump to navigation Jump to search
→‎Regarding the source The Two Babylons: further remarks, and response to suggestion of a move
Line 24: Line 24:     
:Perhaps a page move to [[Essay:Unbiblical elements of the Catholic Church]] then? (Rather than branding the church as being utterly contrary to the Bible) --[[User:Ed Poor|Ed Poor]] <sup>[[User talk:Ed Poor|Talk]]</sup>
 
:Perhaps a page move to [[Essay:Unbiblical elements of the Catholic Church]] then? (Rather than branding the church as being utterly contrary to the Bible) --[[User:Ed Poor|Ed Poor]] <sup>[[User talk:Ed Poor|Talk]]</sup>
 +
 +
::I decided to address the issue with an historically informed article instead, treating the ''source'' of the contributing author's criticism, Alexander Hislop's ''The Two Babylons: The Papal Worship Proved to Be the Worship of Nimrod and His Wife'' (1853,1858,1916). See [[''The Two Babylons'']]. Charging the Catholic Church with being Unbiblical is a legitimate representation of the position of all anti-Catholic churches and groups. The move you suggest is probably unnecessary, and moreover it would seriously misrepresent the original contributor's intention, since it is the ''whole'' of the Catholic Church that is the topic here, and not simply the several individual elements of its doctrine which are presented here as [[Evidence|evidential]] indications or marks of the character of the whole. See my article [[Great Apostasy]]. --[[User:Dataclarifier|Dataclarifier]] ([[User talk:Dataclarifier|talk]]) 15:53, 9 January 2017 (EST)
Block, SkipCaptcha, Upload, Automoderated users, edit, move, protect
30,891

edits

Navigation menu