Changes

Jump to navigation Jump to search
810 bytes added ,  20:34, January 11, 2017
Line 46: Line 46:  
Thank you for your comments. Interesting article on the refutation of ''Two Babylons''. I will make edits to my essay in order to ensure it is factually correct. --[[User:Ambassador|Ambassador]] ([[User talk:Ambassador|talk]]) 16:22, 9 January 2017 (EST)
 
Thank you for your comments. Interesting article on the refutation of ''Two Babylons''. I will make edits to my essay in order to ensure it is factually correct. --[[User:Ambassador|Ambassador]] ([[User talk:Ambassador|talk]]) 16:22, 9 January 2017 (EST)
 
:Your evident integrity does you credit as an ambassador for Christ. ''Pax vobis'' --[[User:Dataclarifier|Dataclarifier]] ([[User talk:Dataclarifier|talk]]) 16:48, 9 January 2017 (EST)
 
:Your evident integrity does you credit as an ambassador for Christ. ''Pax vobis'' --[[User:Dataclarifier|Dataclarifier]] ([[User talk:Dataclarifier|talk]]) 16:48, 9 January 2017 (EST)
 +
 +
:Addendum: An excellent method of online research is to ask a general question, first ''pro'', and then ''con''. Then read each of the linked articles (takes time but is well worth the trouble). This will usually reveal which sources are reliable and which ones are not. Often there will be unexpected surprises. <br>As an example of asking the right general question online about any controverted subject look at the following linked searches for "why is Catholicism a '''false''' religion?" and "why is Catholicism a '''true''' religion":
 +
:*[http://www.bing.com/search?q=why%20is%20catholicism%20a%20false%20religion&qs-bs&FORM=QBRE Why is Catholicism a false religion]
 +
:*[ ]
 +
:God bless you, Ambassador. --[[User:Dataclarifier|Dataclarifier]] ([[User talk:Dataclarifier|talk]]) 15:34, 11 January 2017 (EST)
Block, SkipCaptcha, Upload, Automoderated users, edit, move, protect
30,891

edits

Navigation menu