SkipCaptcha, Automoderated users, edit
3,266
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 413:
Line 413: + + + + + + + + + +
Talk:Conservapedia proven right (view source)
Revision as of 18:43, March 7, 2017
, 18:43, March 7, 2017→relativity, and "celestial signals defy Einstein": new section
==Facebook==
==Facebook==
I am confused about CP's prediction. Facebook originally had the model that if you post something, all of your friends would see it. It has moved to a revenue model where if you post something, you have to pay to "boost" the post so that more people (including your friends or people who like your page) will see it. So, the drop in organic views is as a result of the new revenue model. [[User:JDano|JDano]] ([[User talk:JDano|talk]]) 07:42, 3 March 2017 (EST)
I am confused about CP's prediction. Facebook originally had the model that if you post something, all of your friends would see it. It has moved to a revenue model where if you post something, you have to pay to "boost" the post so that more people (including your friends or people who like your page) will see it. So, the drop in organic views is as a result of the new revenue model. [[User:JDano|JDano]] ([[User talk:JDano|talk]]) 07:42, 3 March 2017 (EST)
== relativity, and "celestial signals defy Einstein" ==
The problem was actually that item number 8 was being singled out, a fact which I ridiculed with my comment about "eye-catching title". There is nothing special about that item; it's just one of 49. The correct final outcome should simply be that the number has grown to 49. (And will presumably continue to grow, albeit very slowly.)
I believe that what I put in the "liberal claptrap in response" column is correct. I think Andy and I can agree that people disputing relativity would not get a faculty position or PhD.; we just disagree on the reason for that. Being a liberal or a conservative would not affect this; one's general political stance would not get you off the hook.
People discuss shortcomings of relativity all the time, such as the disconnect with quantum mechanics at the Planck scale. That won't get you sacked. Only complete non-acceptance will.
[[User:SamHB|SamHB]] ([[User talk:SamHB|talk]]) 13:43, 7 March 2017 (EST)