2
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 96:
Line 96: + +
Talk:Conservapedia proven right (view source)
Revision as of 23:27, June 9, 2017
, 23:27, June 9, 2017→What is the point of this article ?: Beginning new discussion related to the topic at hand.
:::Douglas, I'm [[Essay:Quantifying Openmindedness|open-minded about this]], but don't think the alternative titles would be an improvement.--[[User:Aschlafly|Andy Schlafly]] 12:41, 29 February 2012 (EST)
:::Douglas, I'm [[Essay:Quantifying Openmindedness|open-minded about this]], but don't think the alternative titles would be an improvement.--[[User:Aschlafly|Andy Schlafly]] 12:41, 29 February 2012 (EST)
I'm with [[User:PhilipN|PhilipN]] here, honestly. This article kind of feels like boasting. Why would you need to have an article about being proven right if everything on the website is correct anyway? [[User:ThankGodForRifles|Jake Brand]] 19:25, 9 June 2017 (EST)
== Gay penguin ==
== Gay penguin ==