553
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 4:
Line 4: + + + +
Popper
Can you explain how a Professor of Geriatric Medicine is an expert in psychology( or even science--as opposed to medicine or geriatrics)? If not I really think that reference is inappropriate and should be removed. --[[User:Reginod|Reginod]] 13:39, 27 April 2007 (EDT)
Can you explain how a Professor of Geriatric Medicine is an expert in psychology( or even science--as opposed to medicine or geriatrics)? If not I really think that reference is inappropriate and should be removed. --[[User:Reginod|Reginod]] 13:39, 27 April 2007 (EDT)
== Popper ==
Actually now that I look at it I think the comment about Popper should also be removed, since the opinions of philosophers are not relevant to what is or is not science (as per this comment [http://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Talk:Isaac_Newton&diff=prev&oldid=26137] ), but to be clear that I am acting in good faith I figured I’d put this on the talk page to avoid any appearance that I was engaging in an edit war or some other forbidden behavior.--[[User:Reginod|Reginod]] 13:44, 27 April 2007 (EDT)