953
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 8:
Line 8: + +
→Popper
Actually now that I look at it I think the comment about Popper should also be removed, since the opinions of philosophers are not relevant to what is or is not science (as per this comment [http://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Talk:Isaac_Newton&diff=prev&oldid=26137] ), but to be clear that I am acting in good faith I figured I’d put this on the talk page to avoid any appearance that I was engaging in an edit war or some other forbidden behavior.--[[User:Reginod|Reginod]] 13:44, 27 April 2007 (EDT)
Actually now that I look at it I think the comment about Popper should also be removed, since the opinions of philosophers are not relevant to what is or is not science (as per this comment [http://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Talk:Isaac_Newton&diff=prev&oldid=26137] ), but to be clear that I am acting in good faith I figured I’d put this on the talk page to avoid any appearance that I was engaging in an edit war or some other forbidden behavior.--[[User:Reginod|Reginod]] 13:44, 27 April 2007 (EDT)
:If Popper isn't a good source on what is or is not science I'm not sure who would be. Some of the end of this article is a bit of a stretch, at least the part about no experiments showing any merit of his work. There are many studies showing that psychoanalysis can be a useful treatment. But that has little to do with Freud's ideas about psychosexual stages or id/ego/superego. [[User:Murray|Murray]] 13:59, 27 April 2007 (EDT)