1,792
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 22:
Line 22: + +
Freud was not a scientist either.
::Why is Popper, a philosopher and not a scientist, an appropriate reference here? Or is it now the case that philosophers of science are relevant sources when it comes to science? --[[User:Reginod|Reginod]] 15:57, 27 April 2007 (EDT)
::Why is Popper, a philosopher and not a scientist, an appropriate reference here? Or is it now the case that philosophers of science are relevant sources when it comes to science? --[[User:Reginod|Reginod]] 15:57, 27 April 2007 (EDT)
::: Freud was not a scientist either. Freud was a charlatan. Popper is cited for a point in the philosophy of science, and he was an expert on that. [[User:RSchlafly|RSchlafly]] 17:57, 27 April 2007 (EDT)