553
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 24:
Line 24: + +
no edit summary
::: Freud was not a scientist either. Freud was a charlatan. Popper is cited for a point in the philosophy of science, and he was an expert on that. [[User:RSchlafly|RSchlafly]] 17:57, 27 April 2007 (EDT)
::: Freud was not a scientist either. Freud was a charlatan. Popper is cited for a point in the philosophy of science, and he was an expert on that. [[User:RSchlafly|RSchlafly]] 17:57, 27 April 2007 (EDT)
::::Last time I cited a philosopher of science for a point about just that I was told that it was not relevant, in fact I was told that it was not relevant by you. Why is philosophy of science relevant for the current (or past) state of science here, but not in the case of Newton? --[[User:Reginod|Reginod]] 09:30, 28 April 2007 (EDT)