Changes

Jump to navigation Jump to search
→‎Vaccination: new section
Line 397: Line 397:  
::Noted, thank you. [[User:Desmonduk|Desmonduk]] ([[User talk:Desmonduk|talk]]) 18:57, 24 March 2017 (EDT)
 
::Noted, thank you. [[User:Desmonduk|Desmonduk]] ([[User talk:Desmonduk|talk]]) 18:57, 24 March 2017 (EDT)
 
:::Thanks. I improved the [[microevolution]] article. I added the necessary additional material which supposedly was unnecessary to say. :)  My guess is that User: ChristopherW was probably ignorant on the topic of microevolution vs. macroevolution and if he got in a public debate with a creationist he would very likely lose (see: [[Creation scientists tend to win debates with evolutionists]]). [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] ([[User talk:Conservative|talk]]) 19:15, 24 March 2017 (EDT)
 
:::Thanks. I improved the [[microevolution]] article. I added the necessary additional material which supposedly was unnecessary to say. :)  My guess is that User: ChristopherW was probably ignorant on the topic of microevolution vs. macroevolution and if he got in a public debate with a creationist he would very likely lose (see: [[Creation scientists tend to win debates with evolutionists]]). [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] ([[User talk:Conservative|talk]]) 19:15, 24 March 2017 (EDT)
 +
 +
== Vaccination ==
 +
 +
I am thinking of creating an article: [[Examples of Bias in Wikipedia: Vaccination]].  Wikipedia is fanatically pro-vaccination.  This is very apparent in the Wikipedia article Vaxxed [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Vaxxed]. It is allegedly about the film "Vaxxed" but is actually a potentially libelous character assassination of Dr Andrew Wakefield.  My own view is that parents should be allowed to decide for themselves whether or not to have their children vaccinated. Is this in line with Conservapedia policy? [[User:Desmonduk|Desmonduk]] ([[User talk:Desmonduk|talk]]) 08:55, 27 March 2017 (EDT)
Block, SkipCaptcha, Automoderated users, edit
1,401

edits

Navigation menu