| | ::::::I also question #5. It's true that Jesus sometimes spoke about himself in the third person, but if he was risen from the dead, would he really need to explain the history of himself in third person? He could just open their eyes and show them, rather than going to the work of explaining it. I don't know--no one does, but this sound questionable to me. Besides, on the road to Amadeus, it says he "talked with them" and answered questions. Hebrews is a one-sided speech or letter, not a conversation. I know people took much longer durations in conversation to speak before giving others their turn to speak, but this is a non-stop message. --[[User:DavidB4|<font color="ForestGreen">David B</font>]] <sup>([[User talk:DavidB4|TALK]])</sup> 13:42, 5 April 2017 (EDT) | | ::::::I also question #5. It's true that Jesus sometimes spoke about himself in the third person, but if he was risen from the dead, would he really need to explain the history of himself in third person? He could just open their eyes and show them, rather than going to the work of explaining it. I don't know--no one does, but this sound questionable to me. Besides, on the road to Amadeus, it says he "talked with them" and answered questions. Hebrews is a one-sided speech or letter, not a conversation. I know people took much longer durations in conversation to speak before giving others their turn to speak, but this is a non-stop message. --[[User:DavidB4|<font color="ForestGreen">David B</font>]] <sup>([[User talk:DavidB4|TALK]])</sup> 13:42, 5 April 2017 (EDT) |
| | + | :::::::DavidB4, I really appreciate your feedback about this. Starting with #8, that was fully vetted here on Conservapedia in [[Essay:Adulteress Story]]. The crime was not punishable by death at the time, and there are numerous other historical flaws to the story. Virtually all scholars agree the story is a fabrication inserted later into the [[Bible]]. Most versions acknowledge this with a footnote. Yet [[liberal]]s are more likely to cite this story than any other - which is another reason to be skeptical about its authenticity. Thanks for your interest.--[[User:Aschlafly|Andy Schlafly]] ([[User talk:Aschlafly|talk]]) 20:48, 5 April 2017 (EDT) |
| | Personally, I have no great problem with the general statement on the Bible - like #1, #2, #7. But the moment, Andrew Schlafly addresses a specific verse, problems arise. --[[User:AugustO|AugustO]] ([[User talk:AugustO|talk]]) 18:44, 5 April 2017 (EDT) | | Personally, I have no great problem with the general statement on the Bible - like #1, #2, #7. But the moment, Andrew Schlafly addresses a specific verse, problems arise. --[[User:AugustO|AugustO]] ([[User talk:AugustO|talk]]) 18:44, 5 April 2017 (EDT) |