SkipCaptcha
1,101
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 37:
Line 37: + + + + + +
→Removal of irrelevant data
I just made a considerable expansion to the part of the page Historicity of the Exodus. If anyone has any thoughts, feel free to respond to me here or on my Talk Page.[[User:Korvex|Korvex]] ([[User talk:Korvex|talk]]) 18:30, 7 April 2017 (EDT)
I just made a considerable expansion to the part of the page Historicity of the Exodus. If anyone has any thoughts, feel free to respond to me here or on my Talk Page.[[User:Korvex|Korvex]] ([[User talk:Korvex|talk]]) 18:30, 7 April 2017 (EDT)
NOTE: I'm going to delete the last phrase in the article that says the following:
''' More to the point, most of these projects have assumed that the Pharaoh of the Exodus was either Ramesses II or his son Merenptah. This supposition is based either on Late Date chronology or on Manetho's initial mistake in assuming that all Dynasties of Egypt ran consecutively. '''
This contains obvious errors. All the dynasties of Egypt DID obviously run consecutively, as all egyptologists know and understand. The idea of Ramses being the exodus-pharaoh is not based on the late date chronology, or anything to do with Manetho, it was based on Exodus 1:11 where the city of Ramses (constructed by Ramses II himself) is mentioned. That is why the 13th century exodus-date theory is made. I am in favor of a 15th century BC exodus, and thus have no bias in this statement. That sentence simply contains obvious nonsense errors and so I will remove it, such will help improve the credibility of this Conservapedia article.[[User:Korvex|Korvex]] ([[User talk:Korvex|talk]]) 20:39, 7 April 2017 (EDT)