Block, Siteadmin, SkipCaptcha, Upload, Automoderated users, Check users, delete, edit, move, oversight, protect, rollback, Administrators
51,035
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 43:
Line 43: + +
→Removal of irrelevant data
This contains obvious errors. All the dynasties of Egypt DID obviously run consecutively, as all egyptologists know and understand. The idea of Ramses being the exodus-pharaoh is not based on the late date chronology, or anything to do with Manetho, it was based on Exodus 1:11 where the city of Ramses (constructed by Ramses II himself) is mentioned. That is why the 13th century exodus-date theory is made. I am in favor of a 15th century BC exodus, and thus have no bias in this statement. That sentence simply contains obvious nonsense errors and so I will remove it, such will help improve the credibility of this Conservapedia article.[[User:Korvex|Korvex]] ([[User talk:Korvex|talk]]) 20:39, 7 April 2017 (EDT)
This contains obvious errors. All the dynasties of Egypt DID obviously run consecutively, as all egyptologists know and understand. The idea of Ramses being the exodus-pharaoh is not based on the late date chronology, or anything to do with Manetho, it was based on Exodus 1:11 where the city of Ramses (constructed by Ramses II himself) is mentioned. That is why the 13th century exodus-date theory is made. I am in favor of a 15th century BC exodus, and thus have no bias in this statement. That sentence simply contains obvious nonsense errors and so I will remove it, such will help improve the credibility of this Conservapedia article.[[User:Korvex|Korvex]] ([[User talk:Korvex|talk]]) 20:39, 7 April 2017 (EDT)
:There is much evidence that the Egyptian dynasties overlapped with each other. Some good Egyptologists disagree with your statement. In fact, there is much evidence that our dating of Egyptian history is plain messed up. See these two articles: [https://answersingenesis.org/archaeology/ancient-egypt/ancient-egyptian-chronology-and-the-book-of-genesis/][https://answersingenesis.org/archaeology/ancient-egypt/doesnt-egyptian-chronology-prove-bible-unreliable/] (the second article shows that the city of Ramses may not have actually been built by Ramses the Great). Just to make myself clear, in case you or anyone else has anything against Answers in Genesis, they cite reliable sources, so either way these are reliable articles. --[[User:1990'sguy|1990'sguy]] ([[User talk:1990'sguy|talk]]) 21:29, 7 April 2017 (EDT)