Changes

Jump to navigation Jump to search
reply
Line 516: Line 516:     
:But SamHB, what worth is it when editors do not move pages into subcategories and then the existing categories end up having hundreds or even thousands of articles? I personally think having some subcategories is more navigatable. --[[User:1990'sguy|1990'sguy]] ([[User talk:1990'sguy|talk]]) 12:19, 8 April 2017 (EDT)
 
:But SamHB, what worth is it when editors do not move pages into subcategories and then the existing categories end up having hundreds or even thousands of articles? I personally think having some subcategories is more navigatable. --[[User:1990'sguy|1990'sguy]] ([[User talk:1990'sguy|talk]]) 12:19, 8 April 2017 (EDT)
 +
 +
::I assume that, by "move into subcategories" you mean list the subcategory in the list at the bottom of the article, ''and remove the higher category''.  I'm simply arguing for keeping both, for topics like physics, chemistry, and mathematics.  The subcategories are still navigable, if that's the way you like to have the stuff presented.  The subcategories are always listed at the top of the category page.  You can click on those and explore the tree.  My point is that, if you want to see the article on Maxwell's equations, you might not know how to navigate down the tree.  But it will be there, under "M".  You may have to scroll down a bit, but you will see it.  [[User:SamHB|SamHB]] ([[User talk:SamHB|talk]]) 12:29, 8 April 2017 (EDT)
SkipCaptcha, Automoderated users, edit
3,266

edits

Navigation menu