Block, SkipCaptcha, Automoderated users, edit, rollback
5,023
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 33:
Line 33: + + + + + + +
no edit summary
Why is Andrew Schlafly's insight more reliable than the Gospel of Mark?
Why is Andrew Schlafly's insight more reliable than the Gospel of Mark?
{{cquote|Mark wasn't there. Jesus did not speak aloud to a storm.|||[[Talk:Biblical scientific foreknowledge#Embarrassing Error|Andy Schlafly (talk) 09:44, 10 March 2016 (EST)]]}}
{{cquote|Mark wasn't there. Jesus did not speak aloud to a storm.|||[[Talk:Biblical scientific foreknowledge#Embarrassing Error|Andy Schlafly (talk) 09:44, 10 March 2016 (EST)]]}}
----
{{cquote|''There were no monarchies at the time of Christ''||| [[Talk:Epistle to the Hebrews (Translated)|Andy Schlafly, 00:47, 21 October 2015 (EDT)]]}}
{{cquote|''Augustus established a constitutional monarchy rather than a true republic, because the Senate's role became only advisory.''|||Andy Schlafly, [[World History Lecture Four#Birth of the Roman Empire|WHL4: Birth of the Roman Empire]]}}
----
----
From [[User_talk:Aschlafly#Calming_of_the_Storm_-_eight_month_later|Calming of the Storm - eight month later]]:
From [[User_talk:Aschlafly#Calming_of_the_Storm_-_eight_month_later|Calming of the Storm - eight month later]]: