Irenaeus, Siteadmin, Check users, oversight, Administrators
351,743
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 273:
Line 273: +
→Alexa rank
::::::::I hope so too. The website is still here, so that's a good sign at least. (Although realistically, they usually gather information rather than destroy it.) --[[User:DavidB4|<font color="ForestGreen">David B</font>]] <sup><small>([[User talk:DavidB4|TALK]])</small></sup> 11:16, 10 January 2017 (EST)
::::::::I hope so too. The website is still here, so that's a good sign at least. (Although realistically, they usually gather information rather than destroy it.) --[[User:DavidB4|<font color="ForestGreen">David B</font>]] <sup><small>([[User talk:DavidB4|TALK]])</small></sup> 11:16, 10 January 2017 (EST)
:::::::::Whoever it is, their culling for ideas. CP has become pivotal in the global struggle against [[globalization]] and the [[New World Order]]. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]<sup>[[User talk:RobSmith|''#NeverHillary'']]</sup> 12:25, 10 January 2017 (EST)
:::::::::Whoever it is, their culling for ideas. CP has become pivotal in the global struggle against [[globalization]] and the [[New World Order]]. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]<sup>[[User talk:RobSmith|''#NeverHillary'']]</sup> 12:25, 10 January 2017 (EST)
Given the number of web pages that Conservapedia has, I doubt that 9% of Conservapedia's search engine traffic comes from the Poe's law article. Alexa is wrong about this matter. I largely wrote the Poe's Law article and my guess is that only a very small percentage of Conservapedia's search engine traffic. If you look at the total page views of Conservapedia and then look at the view counter for the Poe's law article, you will probably come to the same conclusion that I have made. [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] ([[User talk:Conservative|talk]]) 17:39, 3 May 2017 (EDT)
== Unlock Template:Infobox person? ==
== Unlock Template:Infobox person? ==