Block, SkipCaptcha, Upload, Automoderated users, Check users, delete, edit, Moderators, move, oversight, protect, ratelimit-exempt, rollback, Administrators
20,387
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 578:
Line 578: + + +
→Potential policy: Conservapedia topic bans/main page talk bans: re
:::::Unrelated, would you please move [http://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Sanctuary_Cities&redirect=no Sanctuary Cities] redirect to redirect to [[Sanctuary city]]? Right now it is a double redirect. --[[User:1990'sguy|1990'sguy]] ([[User talk:1990'sguy|talk]]) 21:36, 5 May 2017 (EDT)
:::::Unrelated, would you please move [http://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Sanctuary_Cities&redirect=no Sanctuary Cities] redirect to redirect to [[Sanctuary city]]? Right now it is a double redirect. --[[User:1990'sguy|1990'sguy]] ([[User talk:1990'sguy|talk]]) 21:36, 5 May 2017 (EDT)
:::::Two more things: would you please add [[:Category:Conservapedia Policy]], ''rather than'' [[:Category:Conservapedia]], as it is more direct? Also, you have not answered my concern that this new policy will actually make CP harder to manage. --[[User:1990'sguy|1990'sguy]] ([[User talk:1990'sguy|talk]]) 21:43, 5 May 2017 (EDT)
:::::Two more things: would you please add [[:Category:Conservapedia Policy]], ''rather than'' [[:Category:Conservapedia]], as it is more direct? Also, you have not answered my concern that this new policy will actually make CP harder to manage. --[[User:1990'sguy|1990'sguy]] ([[User talk:1990'sguy|talk]]) 21:43, 5 May 2017 (EDT)
::::::It sounds like something which could in certain cases be useful. However, I can't see it being regularly used. My main concern is that same as 1990'sguy's. How would this be enforced? If we could get or create a wiki plugin which actually blocked users from editing in pages with certain category tags, this could be a nice thing to have in the toolbox. However, if this will all be done manually, I would say it is probably not a very practical idea. One or two users might be manageable, but if we get 20 "topic banned" users, how would we ever keep track of it all, and make sure no one is doing what they shouldn't?
::::::The only way I can see this being somewhat practical without digital support is a "non-controversial" restriction. People who keep adding a LPoV might be banned from editing anything regarding politics or anything else liberalism has infiltrated. If they want to write a page on how cars are manufactured, then that's fine. However, they would not be allowed to change anything on the "evolution" article.--[[User:DavidB4|<font color="ForestGreen">David B</font>]] <sup>([[User talk:DavidB4|TALK]])</sup> 22:10, 5 May 2017 (EDT)