There is a dispute, as seen in the page history, on whether to add a "TOC" below the section detailing the evidence in favor of Obama being a Muslim and with a header above that section (like what I did [http://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Obama%27s_Religion&diff=1347195&oldid=1347190 here]). I strongly support doing this because it makes the article more evenhanded, rather than making it seem like we're arguing that Obama is a Muslim (we should state facts and let the readers come to a conclusion through them). Also, the articles [[Liberal]] and [[Conservative]] do the same thing. This will not reduce the visibility of the "in favor" section. --[[User:1990'sguy|1990'sguy]] ([[User talk:1990'sguy|talk]]) 16:14, 27 May 2017 (EDT) | There is a dispute, as seen in the page history, on whether to add a "TOC" below the section detailing the evidence in favor of Obama being a Muslim and with a header above that section (like what I did [http://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Obama%27s_Religion&diff=1347195&oldid=1347190 here]). I strongly support doing this because it makes the article more evenhanded, rather than making it seem like we're arguing that Obama is a Muslim (we should state facts and let the readers come to a conclusion through them). Also, the articles [[Liberal]] and [[Conservative]] do the same thing. This will not reduce the visibility of the "in favor" section. --[[User:1990'sguy|1990'sguy]] ([[User talk:1990'sguy|talk]]) 16:14, 27 May 2017 (EDT) |