Changes

Jump to navigation Jump to search
→‎TOC and header dispute: Our liberal and conservative entries are fine: no TOC that obscures the content on the first page.
Line 322: Line 322:     
:This kind of stuff is done on [[Wikipedia]], with a big TOC that tends to obscure the best insights of the entry.  I'll check our [[liberal]] and [[conservative]] entries to see if the first page is covered with a TOC.  If so, I'll remove it there also.  When people click on an entry, they want content quickly, not an overlay that requires them to dig further.--[[User:Aschlafly|Andy Schlafly]] ([[User talk:Aschlafly|talk]]) 01:25, 28 May 2017 (EDT)
 
:This kind of stuff is done on [[Wikipedia]], with a big TOC that tends to obscure the best insights of the entry.  I'll check our [[liberal]] and [[conservative]] entries to see if the first page is covered with a TOC.  If so, I'll remove it there also.  When people click on an entry, they want content quickly, not an overlay that requires them to dig further.--[[User:Aschlafly|Andy Schlafly]] ([[User talk:Aschlafly|talk]]) 01:25, 28 May 2017 (EDT)
 +
 +
::Our [[liberal]] and [[conservative]] entries are fine:  no TOC that obscures the content on the first page.--[[User:Aschlafly|Andy Schlafly]] ([[User talk:Aschlafly|talk]]) 01:26, 28 May 2017 (EDT)
Anthony, Irenaeus, Siteadmin, apieditor, Bureaucrats, Check users, nsAm_Govt_101RO, nsAm_Govt_101RW, nsAm_Govt_101_ta, nsJudgesRO, nsJudgesRW, nsJudges_talkRO, nsJudges_talkRW, nsTeam2RO, nsTeam2RW, nsTeam2_talkRO, nsTeam2_talkRW, oversight, Administrators
126,619

edits

Navigation menu