Changes

Jump to navigation Jump to search
Line 408: Line 408:  
::::I was being serious. Unless you think that Nancy Reagan and Anthony Scalia's funerals were the only Christian funerals out there and that somehow mentioning that meant Obama didn't attend any Christian funerals, I suggest you stop removing it, because those funerals listed were for Nancy Reagan and Anthony Scalia, and nowhere in that article did it state or hint that he does not go to any Christian funerals. [[User:Pokeria1|Pokeria1]] ([[User talk:Pokeria1|talk]]) 20:11, 30 May 2017 (EDT)
 
::::I was being serious. Unless you think that Nancy Reagan and Anthony Scalia's funerals were the only Christian funerals out there and that somehow mentioning that meant Obama didn't attend any Christian funerals, I suggest you stop removing it, because those funerals listed were for Nancy Reagan and Anthony Scalia, and nowhere in that article did it state or hint that he does not go to any Christian funerals. [[User:Pokeria1|Pokeria1]] ([[User talk:Pokeria1|talk]]) 20:11, 30 May 2017 (EDT)
 
:::::I appreciate the source and will validate the information.  In the meantime, I suggest that everyone rethink the overall format of the article.  At present, the first section presents a series of weak arguments for Obama being a Muslim and the second section explains Obama's own view of his religious beliefs followed by a point-by-point refutation of the first section.  Some, like the funeral point, was a bit of trolling by someone who was unhappy that Obama did not attend the Reagan and Scalia funerals.  Others, like the statement that Obama did not visit Israel during his first term, was probably written before Obama visited Israel twice during his second term.  I would feel more comfortable with an article that did not try (weakly) to convince the reader that Obama is a Muslim and then shows how Obama is not a Muslim. Thanks, [[User:JDano|JDano]] ([[User talk:JDano|talk]]) 01:55, 31 May 2017 (EDT)
 
:::::I appreciate the source and will validate the information.  In the meantime, I suggest that everyone rethink the overall format of the article.  At present, the first section presents a series of weak arguments for Obama being a Muslim and the second section explains Obama's own view of his religious beliefs followed by a point-by-point refutation of the first section.  Some, like the funeral point, was a bit of trolling by someone who was unhappy that Obama did not attend the Reagan and Scalia funerals.  Others, like the statement that Obama did not visit Israel during his first term, was probably written before Obama visited Israel twice during his second term.  I would feel more comfortable with an article that did not try (weakly) to convince the reader that Obama is a Muslim and then shows how Obama is not a Muslim. Thanks, [[User:JDano|JDano]] ([[User talk:JDano|talk]]) 01:55, 31 May 2017 (EDT)
 +
:::::::The whole page is just a garbled mess - and it's got 400,OOO hits. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]<sup>[[User talk:RobSmith|''Deep Six the Deep State!'']]</sup> 13:02, 31 May 2017 (EDT)
Block, Siteadmin, SkipCaptcha, Upload, Automoderated users, delete, edit, move, nsTeam2RO, nsTeam2RW, nsTeam2_talkRO, nsTeam2_talkRW, protect, rollback, Administrators, template
295,844

edits

Navigation menu