SkipCaptcha
731
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 684:
Line 684: + +
→"suggests that he was not the target of a political assassination"
=="suggests that he was not the target of a political assassination"==
=="suggests that he was not the target of a political assassination"==
How do you make this leap to a conclusion? [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]<sup>[[User talk:RobSmith|''Deep Six the Deep State!'']]</sup> 23:02, 5 June 2017 (EDT)
How do you make this leap to a conclusion? [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]<sup>[[User talk:RobSmith|''Deep Six the Deep State!'']]</sup> 23:02, 5 June 2017 (EDT)
:It is not ''a leap to conclusion'' that the murder was not a political assassination. It is an observation that two things merely ''suggest'' not an assassination: 1) the fight & 2) no head shot, leaving Seth alive & talking. One would expect a sudden killing with lethal action, instead of getting into a fight with a careless wounding. Other considerations suggest ''not a robbery'' & that an assassination is a hypothesis worthy of consideration, like the "not to worry" bye statement on the cell phone. But I will change it to read, "require explanation." ([[User:Thunkful2|Thunkful2]] ([[User talk:Thunkful2|talk]]) 11:52, 6 June 2017 (EDT))