SkipCaptcha
731
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 877:
Line 877: + + + + + + + +
→Ambassador Craig Murray's Testimony
“Neither of [the leaks] came from the Russians,” Mr. Murray told the British newspaper. “The source had legal access to the information. The documents came from inside leaks, not hacks.”
“Neither of [the leaks] came from the Russians,” Mr. Murray told the British newspaper. “The source had legal access to the information. The documents came from inside leaks, not hacks.”
[Q] ([[User:Thunkful2|Thunkful2]] ([[User talk:Thunkful2|talk]]) 15:48, 13 June 2017 (EDT))
[Q] ([[User:Thunkful2|Thunkful2]] ([[User talk:Thunkful2|talk]]) 15:48, 13 June 2017 (EDT))
'''ConsortiumNews.com "A Spy Coup in America?" (December 18, 2016)
'''
[Q of Murray:]
:Though Murray has declined to say exactly what the meeting in the woods was about, he may have been passing along messages about ways to protect the source from possible retaliation, maybe even an extraction plan if the source was in some legal or physical danger.
Murray has disputed a report in London’s Daily Mail that he was receiving a batch of the leaked Democratic emails. “The material, I think, was already safely with WikiLeaks before I got there in September,” Murray said in the interview with Scott Horton. “I had a small role to play.”
Murray also suggested that the DNC leak and the Podesta leak came from two different sources, neither of them the Russian government.
“The Podesta emails and the DNC emails are, of course, two separate things and we shouldn’t conclude that they both have the same source,” Murray said. “In both cases we’re talking of a leak, not a hack, in that the person who was responsible for getting that information out had legal access to that information.” [/Q]