Changes

Jump to navigation Jump to search
Line 661: Line 661:  
:*That a few MSM media stories have followed the government' lead in the bringing religion into this.
 
:*That a few MSM media stories have followed the government' lead in the bringing religion into this.
 
:*The story then conclude with an attack on the MSM as "conspicuously silent on this case and their silence is deafening" and "aiding and abetting violence against women out of a politically correct fueled fear of offending Muslims."  On the whole, this is an advocacy piece trying to bootstrap a failure of the MSM to play up the religion angle so as to explain why they did not report on the dramatic launch of a "new national campaign" when there apparently is no such campaign.
 
:*The story then conclude with an attack on the MSM as "conspicuously silent on this case and their silence is deafening" and "aiding and abetting violence against women out of a politically correct fueled fear of offending Muslims."  On the whole, this is an advocacy piece trying to bootstrap a failure of the MSM to play up the religion angle so as to explain why they did not report on the dramatic launch of a "new national campaign" when there apparently is no such campaign.
−
:I think the article is very misleading, and plays into the hands of those who would assert that this prosecution is anti-Muslim motivated.  We don't need to cite it.  We have now fixed the [[Donald Trump achievements]] article to just focus on the individual prosecution.  I have been trying to take any mention of religion out of the article bullet as well, because neither the statute nor the indictment mentions religion. Thanks, [[User:JDano|JDano]] ([[User talk:JDano|talk]]) 19:04, 14 June 2017 (EDT)
+
:I think the article is very misleading, and plays into the hands of those who would assert that this prosecution is anti-Muslim motivated.  We don't need to cite it.  We have now fixed the [[Donald Trump achievements]] article to just focus on the individual prosecution.  I have been trying to take any mention of religion out of the article bullet as well, because neither the statute nor the indictment mentions religion. Thanks, [[User:JDano|JDano]] ([[User talk:JDano|talk]]) 19:05, 14 June 2017 (EDT)
 
:I think it is an appropriate article to cite. [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] ([[User talk:Conservative|talk]]) 18:56, 14 June 2017 (EDT)
 
:I think it is an appropriate article to cite. [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] ([[User talk:Conservative|talk]]) 18:56, 14 June 2017 (EDT)
SkipCaptcha
3,995

edits

Navigation menu