Changes

Cheers! --[[User:DavidB4|<font color="ForestGreen">David B</font>]] ^{([[User talk:DavidB4|TALK]])} 21:35, 14 June 2017 (EDT)

Cheers! --[[User:DavidB4|<font color="ForestGreen">David B</font>]] ^{([[User talk:DavidB4|TALK]])} 21:35, 14 June 2017 (EDT)

:Yesterday, the bullet read, "Although receiving little reporting from the mainstream media, the Justice Department established a policy in April 2017 against female genital mutilation, which is practiced among many Muslims.[29]" citing just the Breitbart article.  We have now established that DOJ did not establish a policy in April 2017.  The new bullet is better, but we are arguing over whether the Breitbart article is too over-the-top and misleading to be cited to support the current bullet.  Also, please note: [http://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Donald_Trump_achievements&diff=1353799&oldid=1353794 diff] where two sets of three people with the same three names were thought to be a total 6 distinct people, but were in fact just three. Most of the relevant discussion is on my talk page, but 1990sguy has also moved it to Andy's talk page '''and''' the Community forum page.  A feeling of page ownership is no reason to resist logic and research. [[User:JDano|JDano]] ([[User talk:JDano|talk]]) 22:01, 14 June 2017 (EDT)

:Yesterday, the bullet read, "Although receiving little reporting from the mainstream media, the Justice Department established a policy in April 2017 against female genital mutilation, which is practiced among many Muslims.[29]" citing just the Breitbart article.  We have now established that DOJ did not establish a policy in April 2017.  The new bullet is better, but we are arguing over whether the Breitbart article is too over-the-top and misleading to be cited to support the current bullet.  Also, please note: [http://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Donald_Trump_achievements&diff=1353799&oldid=1353794 diff] where two sets of three people with the same three names were thought to be a total 6 distinct people, but were in fact just three. Most of the relevant discussion is on my talk page, but 1990sguy has also moved it to Andy's talk page '''and''' the Community forum page.  A feeling of page ownership is no reason to resist logic and research. [[User:JDano|JDano]] ([[User talk:JDano|talk]]) 22:01, 14 June 2017 (EDT)

::The Breitbart article is entirely appropriate, and any editorial statement is dwarfed by what we see in the MSM. I have considered your criticisms, and I did change much of what the statement said. I am willing to consider other points of views. You, apparently, are unwilling to even hold off editing the article while we are waiting for a consensus. If your only criticism is citing a source, and if every single other editor has no problem with the source, you should just let it go. I am serious: I have been extremely patient with you. Please stop, I am sick of this, but because I am convinced there is no problem with the Breitbart article, ''at least to the point of having to remove the article,'' I will continue to ensure that it stays. --[[User:1990&#39;sguy|1990&#39;sguy]] ([[User talk:1990&#39;sguy|talk]]) 22:06, 14 June 2017 (EDT)

::The Breitbart article is entirely appropriate, and any editorial statement is dwarfed by what we see in the MSM. I have considered your criticisms, and I did change much of what the statement said. I am willing to consider other points of views. You, apparently, are unwilling to even hold off editing the article while we are waiting for a consensus. If your only criticism is citing a source, and if every single other editor besides yourself has no problem with the source, you should just let it go. I am serious: I have been extremely patient with you. Please stop, I am sick of this, but because I am convinced there is no problem with the Breitbart article, ''at least to the point of having to remove the article,'' I will continue to ensure that it stays. --[[User:1990&#39;sguy|1990&#39;sguy]] ([[User talk:1990&#39;sguy|talk]]) 22:06, 14 June 2017 (EDT)