Block, SkipCaptcha, Upload, Automoderated users, Check users, delete, edit, Moderators, move, oversight, protect, ratelimit-exempt, rollback, Administrators
20,522
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 201:
Line 201: + + +
Talk:Donald Trump achievements (view source)
Revision as of 23:34, June 15, 2017
, 23:34, June 15, 2017→Edit war comment: hasn't this gone on long enough?
:::In any case, if the policy does not exist, then that clearly should go. --[[User:DavidB4|<font color="ForestGreen">David B</font>]] <sup>([[User talk:DavidB4|TALK]])</sup> 22:17, 14 June 2017 (EDT)
:::In any case, if the policy does not exist, then that clearly should go. --[[User:DavidB4|<font color="ForestGreen">David B</font>]] <sup>([[User talk:DavidB4|TALK]])</sup> 22:17, 14 June 2017 (EDT)
::::We originally only cited the Breitbart article, but because of the dispute, we have about eight cited articles for this achievement -- and I think this is a good thing: having several sources with different standpoints, all verifying the achievement. JDano did positive work in that regard (he provided most and got me to provide others), but I think it is time for time to let the Breitbart article go an be content with what he has already done. --[[User:1990'sguy|1990'sguy]] ([[User talk:1990'sguy|talk]]) 22:21, 14 June 2017 (EDT)
::::We originally only cited the Breitbart article, but because of the dispute, we have about eight cited articles for this achievement -- and I think this is a good thing: having several sources with different standpoints, all verifying the achievement. JDano did positive work in that regard (he provided most and got me to provide others), but I think it is time for time to let the Breitbart article go an be content with what he has already done. --[[User:1990'sguy|1990'sguy]] ([[User talk:1990'sguy|talk]]) 22:21, 14 June 2017 (EDT)
:::::Folks, we really don't need this kind of in-fighting. Andy said the Breitbart article 1990'sguy added was fine, so please leave it there. Please work together on this, and understand that once published, everyone has an equal right to revise or remove content, but this should not become a fight. No one truly "owns" a mainspace page--it is there for everyone to change so that the [[best of the public]] can result. If your edit conflicts, wait a bit then try again--it's not a race, so please take your time. You two seem to be at each others' throats. I might appreciate this determination if it was an important topic, but from what I've seen, it really isn't. Please keep be respectful, and sort this out. I can't say one is clearly right while the other is wrong, but I can say that edit warring is wrong. It's against the rules, and could get you both banned permanently. That said, assistant SysOps such as yourselves are not allowed to ban in order to resolve a dispute. Only full administrators can do that. Assistant SysOps are only to ban for blatant disregard for the rules and clear hostile intent. Both of you seem to want the right thing, but are going about it all wrong. How about this bullet be moved to the talk page and worked out between you two, rather than just reverting mainspace changes over and over. I know you both mean well, but please show it by working together better--Wikis are all about collaboration.
:::::This article has developed well, and I trust will continue to. You both have also done great work in other areas. Please don't overshadow that by fighting now. Thank you! --[[User:DavidB4|<font color="ForestGreen">David B</font>]] <sup>([[User talk:DavidB4|TALK]])</sup> 19:34, 15 June 2017 (EDT)