Changes

Jump to navigation Jump to search
→‎Opposition to D.T.: Please explain
Line 242: Line 242:  
::::I solved the problem of the article's length. Since the Democrats are in such disarray and Trump could be reelected, the article Donald Trump achievements could grow quite long over the next 7.5 years or so. [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] ([[User talk:Conservative|talk]]) 07:50, 23 June 2017 (EDT)
 
::::I solved the problem of the article's length. Since the Democrats are in such disarray and Trump could be reelected, the article Donald Trump achievements could grow quite long over the next 7.5 years or so. [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] ([[User talk:Conservative|talk]]) 07:50, 23 June 2017 (EDT)
 
:::::I already was planning on dividing the article by year. I haven't done it yet because we are still in the middle of Trump's first year of his presidency. --[[User:1990'sguy|1990'sguy]] ([[User talk:1990'sguy|talk]]) 10:29, 23 June 2017 (EDT)
 
:::::I already was planning on dividing the article by year. I haven't done it yet because we are still in the middle of Trump's first year of his presidency. --[[User:1990'sguy|1990'sguy]] ([[User talk:1990'sguy|talk]]) 10:29, 23 June 2017 (EDT)
 +
::::::Just to be clear, you are proposing to have an article "Donald Trump achievements 2017" and that article will have sections dealing with Opposition to Donald Trump and with Failures and partial failures.  (Presumably an achievement in 2017 that is reversed on judicial review or somehow fails in 2018 would still be in the 2017 article together with the outcome.) Is that your proposal?
 +
::::::Let's say there is a big infrastructure bill with an important new financing mechanism.  Each year, there are dozens of important infrastructure projects financed under the new law.  How would you handle that? [[User:JDano|JDano]] ([[User talk:JDano|talk]]) 21:57, 24 June 2017 (EDT)
SkipCaptcha
3,995

edits

Navigation menu