Block, Siteadmin, SkipCaptcha, Upload, Automoderated users, delete, edit, move, nsTeam2RO, nsTeam2RW, nsTeam2_talkRO, nsTeam2_talkRW, protect, rollback, Administrators, template
293,634
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 37:
Line 37: + + +
→Family friendly
==Family friendly==
==Family friendly==
The Steele Dossier entries need to be made more family friendly. There are words in this article that are more graphic than were used in any network TV newscast (or even on Late Night with Stephen Colbert). Could we find a less explicit way to discuss this please? Thanks, [[User:JDano|JDano]] ([[User talk:JDano|talk]]) 09:09, 24 June 2017 (EDT)
The Steele Dossier entries need to be made more family friendly. There are words in this article that are more graphic than were used in any network TV newscast (or even on Late Night with Stephen Colbert). Could we find a less explicit way to discuss this please? Thanks, [[User:JDano|JDano]] ([[User talk:JDano|talk]]) 09:09, 24 June 2017 (EDT)
==Process==
These timelines examine several scandals, and a rudimentary understanding of process within a bureaucratic organization can be helpful. The impression is often created that scandal investigation, or what the public knows of the, are guided by day-to-day and public pressure. A large bureaucracy, such as the DOJ or Pentagon, are guided by a commitment to preserve institutional stability. For this have a multitude of contingency plans to deal with emergencies or scandals. Like a business, they set forth quarterly guidelines within the institution with policy prescriptions that change every 90 days on how to deal with anticipated goals, events, objectives they reasonable consider the institution may encounter. I'll set forth three illustrations below, but there are many more that become apparent when reviewing these eight-plus years of Obamunism and its hangover.