| − | These timelines examine several scandals, and a rudimentary understanding of process within a bureaucratic organization can be helpful. The impression is often created that scandal investigation, or what the public knows of the, are guided by day-to-day and public pressure. A large bureaucracy, such as the DOJ or Pentagon, are guided by a commitment to preserve institutional stability. For this have a multitude of contingency plans to deal with emergencies or scandals. Like a business, they set forth quarterly guidelines within the institution with policy prescriptions that change every 90 days on how to deal with anticipated goals, events, objectives they reasonable consider the institution may encounter. I'll set forth three illustrations below, but there are many more that become apparent when reviewing these eight-plus years of Obamunism and its hangover. | + | These timelines examine several scandals, and a rudimentary understanding of process within a bureaucratic organization can be helpful. The impression is often created that a scandal investigation, or what the public knows of it, are guided by day-to-day leaks and public pressure. A large bureaucracy, such as the DOJ or Pentagon, are guided by a commitment to preserve institutional stability. For this they have a multitude of contingency plans to deal with emergencies or scandals. Like a business, they set forth quarterly guidelines for the institution with policy prescriptions that change every 90 days on how to deal with anticipated goals, events, and objectives they reasonablely consider the institution may encounter. I'll set forth three illustrations below, but there are many more that become apparent when reviewing these eight-plus years of Obamunism and its hangover. |