SkipCaptcha
3,995
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 299:
Line 299: +
Talk:Donald Trump achievements (view source)
Revision as of 10:24, June 30, 2017
, 10:24, June 30, 2017→Notable Court Cases
::Here is a simple solution: '''limit this page to judicial nominations and appointments. If there is a Supreme Court case that you want to write about, do it in a separate article. If there is a judge that you want to write about, start a biography article for that judge. If a case affects an existing bullet, add a reference to the case in that original bullet.''' Anyone with an understanding of Article III of the Constitution would not dare to call the stuff in this section "Donald Trump achievements." For example, the Binderup v. Holder case that you added yesterday, really started in 2013, and the court received petitions to hear the case in January. They declined to hear the case. How is that a "Donald Trump achievement?" Is there anything in your background or training that would equip you to successfully summarize and accurately cover complex judicial proceedings? This section requires a different skill set than seems to be involved in the other parts of the page. Thanks, [[User:JDano|JDano]] ([[User talk:JDano|talk]]) 17:30, 29 June 2017 (EDT)
::Here is a simple solution: '''limit this page to judicial nominations and appointments. If there is a Supreme Court case that you want to write about, do it in a separate article. If there is a judge that you want to write about, start a biography article for that judge. If a case affects an existing bullet, add a reference to the case in that original bullet.''' Anyone with an understanding of Article III of the Constitution would not dare to call the stuff in this section "Donald Trump achievements." For example, the Binderup v. Holder case that you added yesterday, really started in 2013, and the court received petitions to hear the case in January. They declined to hear the case. How is that a "Donald Trump achievement?" Is there anything in your background or training that would equip you to successfully summarize and accurately cover complex judicial proceedings? This section requires a different skill set than seems to be involved in the other parts of the page. Thanks, [[User:JDano|JDano]] ([[User talk:JDano|talk]]) 17:30, 29 June 2017 (EDT)
:::I have a better idea. I'll ask Andy again what he thinks. It's his website, after all. --[[User:1990'sguy|1990'sguy]] ([[User talk:1990'sguy|talk]]) 02:29, 30 June 2017 (EDT)
:::I have a better idea. I'll ask Andy again what he thinks. It's his website, after all. --[[User:1990'sguy|1990'sguy]] ([[User talk:1990'sguy|talk]]) 02:29, 30 June 2017 (EDT)
::::While he pays the bills and keeps the servers going, from Day 1, this project has been a team effort. Many people have donated countless hours of hard work to build this encyclopedia. Many of those people came here from Wikipedia, because they were turned-off by the dictatorial and immoral conduct of [[Jimmy Wales]]. Under the software license, each contributor owns his own contributions. The total website is much larger than the contributions of any one person. So, in both a moral sense as well as a legal sense, "It's his website, after all." is a very mistaken notion. For success, we need both leadership as well as internal self-assessment of our own skills. While Mr. Schlafly can help steer us toward our common goal, each editor needs to be honest about his own strengths and weaknesses. Is there anything in your background or training that would equip you to successfully summarize and accurately cover complex judicial proceedings? This section requires a different skill set than seems to be involved in the other parts of the page. [[User:JDano|JDano]] ([[User talk:JDano|talk]]) 06:24, 30 June 2017 (EDT)
== Navajo coal power plant ==
== Navajo coal power plant ==
A coal power plant will remain operational at least through 2019. I'm not sure if this was the result of the Trump Administration (the Breitbart article suggests that the Interior Department played a main role in it), but either way, it does not seem like this is appropriate to add here.[http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2017/jun/28/embattled-navajo-coal-power-plant-survive-through-/][http://www.breitbart.com/big-government/2017/06/28/trump-keeping-promise-to-navajo-nation-miners-interior-announces-lease-extension-on-arizona-coal-operations/] --[[User:1990'sguy|1990'sguy]] ([[User talk:1990'sguy|talk]])
A coal power plant will remain operational at least through 2019. I'm not sure if this was the result of the Trump Administration (the Breitbart article suggests that the Interior Department played a main role in it), but either way, it does not seem like this is appropriate to add here.[http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2017/jun/28/embattled-navajo-coal-power-plant-survive-through-/][http://www.breitbart.com/big-government/2017/06/28/trump-keeping-promise-to-navajo-nation-miners-interior-announces-lease-extension-on-arizona-coal-operations/] --[[User:1990'sguy|1990'sguy]] ([[User talk:1990'sguy|talk]])