Block, Siteadmin, SkipCaptcha, Upload, Automoderated users, Check users, delete, edit, move, oversight, protect, rollback, Administrators
51,035
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
mLine 6:
Line 6: − +
no edit summary
:The reference is to NSCE, which, of course, is not going to call its campaign a "propaganda" campaign. Calling it a "science" campaign plays right into the hands of evolutionists, who falsely equate evolution with science. With this term, if evolution is science, then the different theories promoted by creation scientists are not science (aka. "pseudoscience"). --[[User:1990'sguy|1990'sguy]] ([[User talk:1990'sguy|talk]]) 13:56, 30 June 2017 (EDT)
:The reference is to NSCE, which, of course, is not going to call its campaign a "propaganda" campaign. Calling it a "science" campaign plays right into the hands of evolutionists, who falsely equate evolution with science. With this term, if evolution is science, then the different theories promoted by creation scientists are not science (aka. "pseudoscience"). --[[User:1990'sguy|1990'sguy]] ([[User talk:1990'sguy|talk]]) 13:56, 30 June 2017 (EDT)
::Then why not find a reputable reference that says Project Steve is propaganda? I am completely unaware of any creationist theories so your assertion doesn’t make much sense. --[[User:GinnyS|GinnyS]] ([[User talk:GinnyS|talk]]) 14:08, 30 June 2017 (EDT)
::Then why not find a reputable reference that says Project Steve is propaganda? I am completely unaware of any creationist theories so your assertion doesn’t make much sense. --[[User:GinnyS|GinnyS]] ([[User talk:GinnyS|talk]]) 14:08, 30 June 2017 (EDT)
:::I have observed that evolutionists do not bother to take creationists (regardless of what the creationist does) seriously, so they overlook their work. They have no clue that creationists publish papers, graduated from prestegious universites with PhDs, or create scientific theories. Thus, they think looking at some creationist blog counts as seriously examining creation science.
:::I have observed that evolutionists do not bother to take creationists (regardless of what the creationist does) seriously, so they overlook their work. They have no clue that creationists publish papers, graduated from prestigious universities with PhDs, or create scientific theories. Thus, they think looking at some creationist blog counts as seriously examining creation science.
:::I recommend several sources for this topic:
:::I recommend several sources for this topic:
:::*[https://www.amazon.com/Beginning-Compelling-Evidence-Creation-Flood/dp/1878026097 In the Beginning: Compelling Evidence for Creation and the Flood (8th Edition)], by Walt Brown (the 9th edition will be coming out soon)
:::*[https://www.amazon.com/Beginning-Compelling-Evidence-Creation-Flood/dp/1878026097 In the Beginning: Compelling Evidence for Creation and the Flood (8th Edition)], by Walt Brown (the 9th edition will be coming out soon)