88
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 12:
Line 12: + +
no edit summary
:::*Interesting article: [https://answersingenesis.org/creation-science/successful-predictions-creation-scientists/ Successful Predictions by Creation Scientists]
:::*Interesting article: [https://answersingenesis.org/creation-science/successful-predictions-creation-scientists/ Successful Predictions by Creation Scientists]
:::This is just scratching the surface -- many more examples exist. --[[User:1990'sguy|1990'sguy]] ([[User talk:1990'sguy|talk]]) 14:21, 30 June 2017 (EDT)
:::This is just scratching the surface -- many more examples exist. --[[User:1990'sguy|1990'sguy]] ([[User talk:1990'sguy|talk]]) 14:21, 30 June 2017 (EDT)
::::It is very hard to take creationists seriously when they talk about creationism, a subject for which there is no credible evidence. I am well aware of the ardent creationists who have graduated from Ivy league institutions. The fact that their opinions about biology do not appear in reputable peer-reviewed science journals is telling. If Dr Brown and Dr Jeanson are so wonderful, why can’t they get their creationist ideas published by reputable science publications? It seems we are straying from the original topic. Why can’t my critics cite a reference that states what is written in the article? I’m not asking for much. --[[User:GinnyS|GinnyS]] ([[User talk:GinnyS|talk]]) 14:48, 30 June 2017 (EDT)