Block, Siteadmin, SkipCaptcha, Upload, Automoderated users, Check users, delete, edit, move, oversight, protect, rollback, Administrators
51,035
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 269:
Line 269: − == VA to deal with under/unused buildings == − − [http://thehill.com/policy/defense/338637-va-pledges-action-on-1200-vacant-underused-buildings] Might be a very noteworthy achievement, though it seems like the decisions have not translated into action yet. --[[User:1990'sguy|1990'sguy]] ([[User talk:1990'sguy|talk]]) 16:45, 20 June 2017 (EDT) − :Many of these buildings are small buildings that have been used for storage or housing landscaping equipment on larger campuses. There is now increased security at VA facilities, and access to the specific building is in many cases tied to access to the VA campus. One large VA building is in the middle of a state mental hospital, it would be difficult to turn it over to another purpose that requires a location that is welcoming to the public. Finally, some Congressmen would resist reduced federal spending in their district. [[User:JDano|JDano]] ([[User talk:JDano|talk]]) 17:00, 20 June 2017 (EDT)
Talk:Donald Trump achievements (view source)
Revision as of 03:03, July 21, 2017
, 03:03, July 21, 2017Move to Donald Trump achievements: Veterans talk page.
:::::::::It seems like you are changing your argument, because earlier in this section, ''you advocated for'' establishing a quota in how many achievements we can add. We are not going to add quotas, and we are not going to add silly and bureaucratic "criteria" beyond the requirement that it advances conservative ideals. Following this common-sense requirement does '''not''' show "a serious lack of judgment." We use your common sense, and our common sense is supported by many different news outlets that do now have the leftist bias of outlets like CNN and the NYT (which hide Trump's achievements and emphasize silly "Russia" controversies). --[[User:1990'sguy|1990'sguy]] ([[User talk:1990'sguy|talk]]) 11:27, 3 July 2017 (EDT)
:::::::::It seems like you are changing your argument, because earlier in this section, ''you advocated for'' establishing a quota in how many achievements we can add. We are not going to add quotas, and we are not going to add silly and bureaucratic "criteria" beyond the requirement that it advances conservative ideals. Following this common-sense requirement does '''not''' show "a serious lack of judgment." We use your common sense, and our common sense is supported by many different news outlets that do now have the leftist bias of outlets like CNN and the NYT (which hide Trump's achievements and emphasize silly "Russia" controversies). --[[User:1990'sguy|1990'sguy]] ([[User talk:1990'sguy|talk]]) 11:27, 3 July 2017 (EDT)
==Opposition to D.T.==
==Opposition to D.T.==
There is duplication between this section and the recently created article [[Opposition to Donald Trump]]. To avoid exact dupication, I am going to summarize the topic and add "''For more detailed treatment see [[Opposition to Donald Trump]].''" There is no reason to have two full length treatment of the same stuff. It is unfair to reader and makes unnecessary work for editors. Thanks, [[User:JDano|JDano]] ([[User talk:JDano|talk]]) 21:35, 22 June 2017 (EDT)
There is duplication between this section and the recently created article [[Opposition to Donald Trump]]. To avoid exact dupication, I am going to summarize the topic and add "''For more detailed treatment see [[Opposition to Donald Trump]].''" There is no reason to have two full length treatment of the same stuff. It is unfair to reader and makes unnecessary work for editors. Thanks, [[User:JDano|JDano]] ([[User talk:JDano|talk]]) 21:35, 22 June 2017 (EDT)