Changes

Jump to navigation Jump to search
Line 304: Line 304:  
:::::::Your last edit seems awkward, ‘He was and public-schooled…’ --[[User:GinnyS|GinnyS]] ([[User talk:GinnyS|talk]]) 23:14, 28 July 2017 (EDT)
 
:::::::Your last edit seems awkward, ‘He was and public-schooled…’ --[[User:GinnyS|GinnyS]] ([[User talk:GinnyS|talk]]) 23:14, 28 July 2017 (EDT)
 
::::::::It was a typo. Thanks for catching it, but SamHB changed it. I support his edits. --[[User:1990'sguy|1990'sguy]] ([[User talk:1990'sguy|talk]]) 23:21, 28 July 2017 (EDT)
 
::::::::It was a typo. Thanks for catching it, but SamHB changed it. I support his edits. --[[User:1990'sguy|1990'sguy]] ([[User talk:1990'sguy|talk]]) 23:21, 28 July 2017 (EDT)
 +
And I support what both of you are doing.  We just need to look at the facts and follow them wherever they lead, whether that goes against what may be considered "Conservapedia orthodoxy" or not.  He went (briefly) to Catholic school, and he was a mass murderer.  One has to accept that that happened.  We can't censor that.
 +
 +
For what it's worth, in my recent round of edits, I completely ignored any considerations of "Conservative orthodoxy" or "Liberal orthodoxy".  I just read the referenced articles.  Believe it or not, I'm not interested in putting "spin" on what I write.
 +
 +
Oh, and I found some references in the mass media to the role of violent video games.  But any uproar over this didn't go very far.  I think that's because the first amendment makes it very problematical to try to regulate video games.  That may not be a good policy, but that isn't for me to say.
 +
[[User:SamHB|SamHB]] ([[User talk:SamHB|talk]]) 00:04, 29 July 2017 (EDT)
SkipCaptcha, Automoderated users, edit
3,266

edits

Navigation menu