SkipCaptcha
731
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 1,267:
Line 1,267: + + +
→Famous Reporter Seymour Hersh Identifies Seth Rich as communicator with Wikileaks
::As crazy as it is, these things do happen. A Congressional staffer is dispatched to FBI headquarters to perform an oversight function. An FBI source discloses information legally. The staffer returns and reports to the chairman. The chairman or staffer leak to Hersch, and follow your scenario from there. It would be legal without disrupting, obstructing, or compromising an investigation. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]<sup>[[User talk:RobSmith|''Deep Six the Deep State!'']]</sup> 20:15, 3 August 2017 (EDT)
::As crazy as it is, these things do happen. A Congressional staffer is dispatched to FBI headquarters to perform an oversight function. An FBI source discloses information legally. The staffer returns and reports to the chairman. The chairman or staffer leak to Hersch, and follow your scenario from there. It would be legal without disrupting, obstructing, or compromising an investigation. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]<sup>[[User talk:RobSmith|''Deep Six the Deep State!'']]</sup> 20:15, 3 August 2017 (EDT)
:::The WickedPedia article on Seymour Hersh claims that his speeches can contain intentional falsehood:
::::I[Q]n an interview with New York magazine, Hersh made a distinction between the standards of strict factual accuracy for his print reporting and the leeway he allows himself in speeches, in which he may talk informally about stories still being worked on or blur information to protect his sources. "Sometimes I change events, dates, and places in a certain way to protect people. ... I can't fudge what I write. But I can certainly fudge what I say."[/Q]