| − | Wilson argued for a “[[Living Constitution]]” that “must be Darwinian in structure and in practice.” Government for him was “not a machine but a living thing. . . .It is modified by its environment, necessitated by its task, shaped to its functions by the sheer pressure of life.” | + | Wilson argued for a “[[Living Constitution]]” that “must be Darwinian in structure and in practice.” Government for him was “not a machine but a living thing. . . .It is modified by its environment, necessitated by its task, shaped to its functions by the sheer pressure of life.” He noted that the Framers "followed Newton" as they created the Constitution, making a comparison to planets in orbit around the sun. Interestingly enough, the Framers used that same analogy during the [[Constitutional Convention]].<ref>[http://avalon.law.yale.edu/18th_century/debates_607.asp Madison Debates, June 7]</ref><ref>[http://avalon.law.yale.edu/18th_century/debates_608.asp Madison Debates, June 8]</ref> |
| − | The citizen must “marry his interests to the state.” Wilson, therefore, dismissed the Declaration’s assertion that rights are endowed by our Creator. Wilson lectured that, “If you want to understand the real Declaration of Independence, do not repeat the preface.” “The rhetorical introduction,” he declared, “is the least part of it.”
| + | Wilson believed that the citizen must “marry his interests to the state.” Wilson, therefore, dismissed the Declaration’s assertion that rights are endowed by our Creator. Wilson lectured that, “If you want to understand the real Declaration of Independence, do not repeat the preface.” “The rhetorical introduction,” he declared, “is the least part of it.” |
| | Wilson also rejected the premise described in the [[Federalist Papers]], that checks and balances are needed because human nature is flawed and does not improve. | | Wilson also rejected the premise described in the [[Federalist Papers]], that checks and balances are needed because human nature is flawed and does not improve. |