Changes

===LGBTI Bundling===

===LGBTI Bundling===

Exploitation of community organizations often involves a public relations ploy that can be called "''bundling''". Bundling is the homosexual activists’ tactic of wrapping themselves in the cloak of "[[civil rights]]" by sponsoring coalitions of minorities and including themselves as a member minority. Their purpose is to advance the idea that "''sexual orientation''" is a genuine basis for minority status by bundling it together with [[race]], [[ethnicity]], [[gender]], etc. Importantly, the homosexuals almost always place racial minorities as the figureheads of these coalitions to create the impression that their primary interest is the advancement of the legitimate minorities. This is not a difficult proposition, since there are some homosexuals who are also racial minorities. The optimum scenario for the homosexual is a coalition headed by an in-the-closet homosexual of a minority race who can pretend neutrality when promoting a homosexual goal.  

Exploitation of community organizations often involves a public relations ploy that can be called "''bundling''". Bundling is the homosexual activists’ tactic of wrapping themselves in the cloak of "[[civil rights]]" by sponsoring coalitions of minorities and including themselves as a member minority. Their purpose is to advance the idea that "''sexual orientation''" is a genuine basis for minority status by bundling it together with [[race]], [[ethnicity]], [[gender]], etc. Importantly, the homosexuals almost always place racial minorities as the figureheads of these coalitions to create the impression that their primary interest is the advancement of the legitimate minorities. This is not a difficult proposition, since there are some homosexuals who are also racial minorities. The optimum scenario for the homosexual is a coalition headed by an in-the-closet homosexual of a minority race who can pretend neutrality when promoting a homosexual goal.  

 

Most important to homosexual strategy in all of these tactics is to hold the key positions and then to directly or indirectly use the power of those positions to change the society, by marketing the homosexual message to the public<ref>{{cite web |title=Dúhový pochod v Bratislave (Rainbow march in [[Bratislava]])  |publisher=Západoslovenská televízia |date=05 Jul 2014 |url=https://youtu.be/0iWM1m9jKxQ?t=155 |quote=video shows IBM and DELL "LGBTI minority" - "a part of all other 'diversity' groups" - supporting the "GAY PRIDE" in Bratislava, Slovakia |language=Slovak |accessdate=06 Mar 2017 }}</ref> while also attacking and marginalizing the pro-family leaders and organizations, for example, by introducing so called Anti-award 'The [[homophobia|homophobe]] of the Year'.<ref>{{cite web |title=Anton Chromík: Kým Peter Weisenbacher neodovzdá cenu víťazovi minulého roka, nemal by robiť ďalší ročník! (If Peter Weisenbacher [LGBT Activist] does not hand over the Award to the vinner from the last year, he should forget starting the new one)|publisher=hlavnespravy.sk  |date=18 Aug 2016 |url=http://www.hlavnespravy.sk/anton-chromik-kym-peter-weisenbacher-neodovzda-cenu-vitazovi-minuleho-roka-nemal-by-robit-dalsi-rocnik/821257 |accessdate=21 Feb 2017 |language=Slovak |quote=Cena Homofób roka mi každý rok pripomína, že Slovenská republika je vo vzťahu k úcte k  ľuďom s homosexuálnym cítením na tom dobre a ja som tomu veľmi rád. Mnohé nominované výroky za posledné roky (napr. nominovaní poslanci za novelu Ústavy o manželstve muža a ženy) a aj môj výherný výrok za rok 2015 to jasne dokazujú. Verím, že autori by nominovali skutočné výroky nenávisti, ak by existovali. V tejto súťaži zrejme nezáleží na obsahu výrokov, ale skôr na tom, že sa hlasovaním dá prejaviť nenávisť voči konkrétnej osobe s iným názorom. Skutočné informovanie o konkrétnych prípadoch nenávisti voči homosexuálne cítiacim absentuje. Aj vďaka takejto súťaži nadobudol pojem homofób skôr význam zástancu manželstva a rodiny muža a ženy. Aj preto som minulý rok zverejnil tlačovú správu, že cenu Homofób roka si rád preberiem verejne na námestí „ešte” Slobody v Bratislave. Aké bolo moje prekvapenie, keď včera Denník SME a portál Aktuality.sk zverejnil, že cenu som si odmietol prevziať. Toto nie je pravda a tým som bol obvinený zo lži. Organizátori súťaže sa zaviazali, že sa cenu pokúsia doručiť, ale nič také neudialo. Viackrát som sa odovzdania ceny domáhal, o čom svedčia aj moje viacnásobné požiadavky v mailovej komunikácii s Inštitútom Petra Weisenbachera. Predložím ich na požiadanie k dispozícii médiám. Žiadam, aby sa mi verejne Peter Weisenbacher a Inštitút ľudských práv ospravedlnil za lož, ktorú o mne zrejme on uviedol v  tlačovej správe a aby nabral odvahu namiesto lži  mi cenu skutočne odovzdať.  Anton Chromík, predseda Aliancia za rodinu.  TRANSLATION INTO ENGLISH: The Anti-Award ‘Homphobe of the Year’ reminds me year by year that Slovakia is doing well when it comes to respecting people suffering from same-sex attractions and I’m very pleased about it.  Many nominated quotes in recent years (e.g. Nomination of MPs for their passing the amendment to the Constitution on definition of marriage as union between one man and one woman) and also my winning statement in 2015 are clear evidence of this. I believe that authors of contest would nominate real examples of hate speech, if such existed.  Obviously, what matters in this award competition is an effort to bully concrete persons who differ in their opinion with organizers, rather than focusing on the meaning of actual quotes. The real information on specific cases of hate speech towards people with same-sex attractions is completely absent. Also owing to this competition, the term ‘homophobe’ became rather a label for defender of marriage and family consisting of man and woman. That's why last year I published a press release informing that I’m ready to publicly receive the Anti-Award ‘Homphobe of the Year’ at the square, so far still of Freedom, in Bratislava. However, I was absolutely taken aback when the mainstream newspaper SME and the internet portal Aktuality.sk published the misinformation asserting that I allegedly refused to receive the accolade. This is not true whatsoever and thus I was accused of lying. The organizers of award-contest have committed themselves to try to deliver the prize to the winner, but nothing like that happened. More than once, I have sought to get the award handed over, as can be proved by my multiple requests in the e-mail communication with the LGBT Institute of human rights run by Peter Weisenbacher. They are available on request to the media. I demand  that Peter Weisenbacher and the Institute of human rights should apologize in public for the lie about me that they evidently stated in the press release for the media; and pull up the courage to arrange for the real award-delivery instead of spreading lies.  Anton Chromík, president of Coalition for family (in Slovak: Aliancia za rodinu)}}</ref>

Most important to homosexual strategy in all of these tactics is to hold the key positions and then to directly or indirectly use the power of those positions to change the society, by marketing the homosexual message to the public<ref>{{cite web |title=Dúhový pochod v Bratislave (Rainbow march in [[Bratislava]])  |publisher=Západoslovenská televízia |date=05 Jul 2014 |url=https://youtu.be/0iWM1m9jKxQ?t=155 |quote=video shows IBM and DELL "LGBTI minority" - "a part of all other 'diversity' groups" - supporting the "GAY PRIDE" in Bratislava, Slovakia |language=Slovak |accessdate=06 Mar 2017 }}</ref> while also attacking and marginalizing the pro-family leaders and organizations, for example, by introducing so called Anti-award 'The [[homophobia|homophobe]] of the Year'.<ref>{{cite web |title=Anton Chromík: Kým Peter Weisenbacher neodovzdá cenu víťazovi minulého roka, nemal by robiť ďalší ročník! (If Peter Weisenbacher [LGBT Activist] does not hand over the Award to the vinner from the last year, he should forget starting the new one)|publisher=hlavnespravy.sk  |date=18 Aug 2016 |url=http://www.hlavnespravy.sk/anton-chromik-kym-peter-weisenbacher-neodovzda-cenu-vitazovi-minuleho-roka-nemal-by-robit-dalsi-rocnik/821257 |accessdate=21 Feb 2017 |language=Slovak |quote=Cena Homofób roka mi každý rok pripomína, že Slovenská republika je vo vzťahu k úcte k  ľuďom s homosexuálnym cítením na tom dobre a ja som tomu veľmi rád. Mnohé nominované výroky za posledné roky (napr. nominovaní poslanci za novelu Ústavy o manželstve muža a ženy) a aj môj výherný výrok za rok 2015 to jasne dokazujú. Verím, že autori by nominovali skutočné výroky nenávisti, ak by existovali. V tejto súťaži zrejme nezáleží na obsahu výrokov, ale skôr na tom, že sa hlasovaním dá prejaviť nenávisť voči konkrétnej osobe s iným názorom. Skutočné informovanie o konkrétnych prípadoch nenávisti voči homosexuálne cítiacim absentuje. Aj vďaka takejto súťaži nadobudol pojem homofób skôr význam zástancu manželstva a rodiny muža a ženy. Aj preto som minulý rok zverejnil tlačovú správu, že cenu Homofób roka si rád preberiem verejne na námestí „ešte” Slobody v Bratislave. Aké bolo moje prekvapenie, keď včera Denník SME a portál Aktuality.sk zverejnil, že cenu som si odmietol prevziať. Toto nie je pravda a tým som bol obvinený zo lži. Organizátori súťaže sa zaviazali, že sa cenu pokúsia doručiť, ale nič také neudialo. Viackrát som sa odovzdania ceny domáhal, o čom svedčia aj moje viacnásobné požiadavky v mailovej komunikácii s Inštitútom Petra Weisenbachera. Predložím ich na požiadanie k dispozícii médiám. Žiadam, aby sa mi verejne Peter Weisenbacher a Inštitút ľudských práv ospravedlnil za lož, ktorú o mne zrejme on uviedol v  tlačovej správe a aby nabral odvahu namiesto lži  mi cenu skutočne odovzdať.  Anton Chromík, predseda Aliancia za rodinu.  TRANSLATION INTO ENGLISH: The Anti-Award ‘Homphobe of the Year’ reminds me year by year that Slovakia is doing well when it comes to respecting people suffering from same-sex attractions and I’m very pleased about it.  Many nominated quotes in recent years (e.g. Nomination of MPs for their passing the amendment to the Constitution on definition of marriage as union between one man and one woman) and also my winning statement in 2015 are clear evidence of this. I believe that authors of contest would nominate real examples of hate speech, if such existed.  Obviously, what matters in this award competition is an effort to bully concrete persons who differ in their opinion with organizers, rather than focusing on the meaning of actual quotes. The real information on specific cases of hate speech towards people with same-sex attractions is completely absent. Also owing to this competition, the term ‘homophobe’ became rather a label for defender of marriage and family consisting of man and woman. That's why last year I published a press release informing that I’m ready to publicly receive the Anti-Award ‘Homphobe of the Year’ at the square, so far still of Freedom, in Bratislava. However, I was absolutely taken aback when the mainstream newspaper SME and the internet portal Aktuality.sk published the misinformation asserting that I allegedly refused to receive the accolade. This is not true whatsoever and thus I was accused of lying. The organizers of award-contest have committed themselves to try to deliver the prize to the winner, but nothing like that happened. More than once, I have sought to get the award handed over, as can be proved by my multiple requests in the e-mail communication with the LGBT Institute of human rights run by Peter Weisenbacher. They are available on request to the media. I demand  that Peter Weisenbacher and the Institute of human rights should apologize in public for the lie about me that they evidently stated in the press release for the media; and pull up the courage to arrange for the real award-delivery instead of spreading lies.  Anton Chromík, president of Coalition for family (in Slovak: Aliancia za rodinu)}}</ref>