Changes

Jump to navigation Jump to search
→‎"Not Any Scientific Reasoning": goes beyond wearing high heals
Line 115: Line 115:     
::::::I guess I missed the point at which non-humans came up.  Sure, that would be consistent, though not necessary.  And? [[User:Murray|Murray]] 15:30, 1 May 2007 (EDT)
 
::::::I guess I missed the point at which non-humans came up.  Sure, that would be consistent, though not necessary.  And? [[User:Murray|Murray]] 15:30, 1 May 2007 (EDT)
 +
:::::::So we can rule out [[asexual]]s then.  But "strong, persistent cross identification" goes beyond wanting to wear high heals.  It deals with sex, either a man wants to have a baby, or woman feels she can impregnate someone, or there is a desire to have sex with members of ones own sex.  Would that be fair characterization?  [[User:RobS|RobS]] 15:37, 1 May 2007 (EDT)
Block, Siteadmin, SkipCaptcha, Upload, Automoderated users, delete, edit, move, nsTeam2RO, nsTeam2RW, nsTeam2_talkRO, nsTeam2_talkRW, protect, rollback, Administrators, template
293,555

edits

Navigation menu