SkipCaptcha, Automoderated users, edit
3,266
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 397:
Line 397: + + + + + + + +
→No Christian feminism?
I think that this article would be served well if a section on [[Christian feminism]] was included. Maybe a new article on it would be better.[[User:Mr. Guye|Mr. Guye]] ([[User talk:Mr. Guye|talk]]) 19:15, 1 December 2017 (EST)
I think that this article would be served well if a section on [[Christian feminism]] was included. Maybe a new article on it would be better.[[User:Mr. Guye|Mr. Guye]] ([[User talk:Mr. Guye|talk]]) 19:15, 1 December 2017 (EST)
:That seems like a good idea, but an article on it would have to be from a theologically conservative point of view. But there's also the fact that the same term can have a different meaning for different people -- what one person considers Christian feminism can be completely different than what another person does. We would need to define the term clearly, but I think we'd be talking about second- and third-wave feminism, adherents of which have theologically and socially left-wing views. --[[User:1990'sguy|1990'sguy]] ([[User talk:1990'sguy|talk]]) 19:47, 1 December 2017 (EST)
:That seems like a good idea, but an article on it would have to be from a theologically conservative point of view. But there's also the fact that the same term can have a different meaning for different people -- what one person considers Christian feminism can be completely different than what another person does. We would need to define the term clearly, but I think we'd be talking about second- and third-wave feminism, adherents of which have theologically and socially left-wing views. --[[User:1990'sguy|1990'sguy]] ([[User talk:1990'sguy|talk]]) 19:47, 1 December 2017 (EST)
:::No, there is no requirement that a Conservapedia article discussing the topic of Christian feminism "would have to be from a theologically conservative point of view." There are no such requirements on content at Conservapedia, and no one, except perhaps Andy, has the authority to enforce such a requirement. All that is required is that "Conservapedia is a politically conservative, Christian encyclopedia project". Though many of our members are not Christians and are not politically conservative, they are required to edit in a manner consistent with the [[Conservapedia:Commandments]]. To require otherwise would turn this wiki into a Wikipedia-style "mobocracy" rather than a "best of the public" project.
:::The concept of feminism covers a lot of ground. There are conservative feminists, Christian feminists, and Republican feminists. Not all feminists subscribe to some of the silly excesses that one sometimes sees looking around on the internet and various media outlets. Many conservative feminists, for example, fully support encouraging girls to go into STEM (science, technology, engineering, and mathematics) subjects.
:::So feel free to write sensible content on this topic. I look forward to reading it.
:::[[User:SamHB|SamHB]] ([[User talk:SamHB|talk]]) 00:49, 3 December 2017 (EST)
::Once Christian denominations filly embrace the notion of female pastors, their memberships almost invariably spiral downward. That should surely be mentioned in relation to "Christian feminism".
::Once Christian denominations filly embrace the notion of female pastors, their memberships almost invariably spiral downward. That should surely be mentioned in relation to "Christian feminism".