Changes

::<math>t = 2(1 - \frac{2c}{1} \frac{.866}{c}) = 2 - 4(.866) = -1.464</math>

::<math>t = 2(1 - \frac{2c}{1} \frac{.866}{c}) = 2 - 4(.866) = -1.464</math>

so <i>negative</i> time has passed for the external observer; the tachyon seems to have arrived before it left, and so has moved back in time according to the rest of the universe. This creates obvious potential for paradox.  

so <i>negative</i> time has passed; the tachyon seems to have arrived before it left, and so has moved back in time from one of the available reference frames. This creates obvious potential for paradox.  

This possibile paradox of effect precluding cause indicates that, if tachyons truly existed, then there may be no free will, and actions would always be pre-determined. Dr. Richard Muller vividly illustrates this in his "tachyon murder paradox," commenting that it gives him personal reason to wish faster than light travel impossible.<ref>Dr. Richard Muller "Tachyon Murder Paradox" - https://www.quora.com/Will-humans-ever-develop-faster-than-light-travel</ref>

This possibility of effect precluding cause indicates that, if tachyons truly existed, then there may be no free will, and actions would always be pre-determined. Otherwise, one observer may have a "early warning" of something that will happen in another observer's frame and somehow change it; but then special relativity frame has it that all reference must agree on whether a spacetime event occurring at all or not: no in-between.

 

This would create a time travel paradox, so it is thought that one would not be allowed to change the past, regardless of wishes; one's actions would be pre-determined, not freely chosen at will. Dr. Richard Muller vividly illustrates this in his "tachyon murder paradox," commenting that it gives him personal reason to wish faster than light travel impossible.<ref>Dr. Richard Muller "Tachyon Murder Paradox" - https://www.quora.com/Will-humans-ever-develop-faster-than-light-travel</ref>

[[Category:Relativity]]

[[Category:Relativity]]