Block, Siteadmin, SkipCaptcha, Upload, Automoderated users, Check users, delete, edit, move, oversight, protect, rollback, Administrators
51,035
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 19:
Line 19: + + + + + + + + + + + + + +
Nationalism vs. globalism (view source)
Revision as of 04:36, January 8, 2018
, 04:36, January 8, 2018no edit summary
{{See also|Conservative}}
{{See also|Conservative}}
Because of nationalism's support of limited, localized, and self-government, conservatives usually support nationalism or at least lean nationalist. Most non-[[establishment]] conservatives see nationalism's support for maintaining independent nation-states as the best avenue to maintain and promote [[freedom]], such as those provided in the [[United States Constitution|U.S. Constitution]]. Also, as conservatives tend to be patriots and love their countries, they oppose policies that undermine national sovereignty and identity, such as open borders, mass migration, and membership in international organizations such as the [[European Union]].
Because of nationalism's support of limited, localized, and self-government, conservatives usually support nationalism or at least lean nationalist. Most non-[[establishment]] conservatives see nationalism's support for maintaining independent nation-states as the best avenue to maintain and promote [[freedom]], such as those provided in the [[United States Constitution|U.S. Constitution]]. Also, as conservatives tend to be patriots and love their countries, they oppose policies that undermine national sovereignty and identity, such as open borders, mass migration, and membership in international organizations such as the [[European Union]].
[[Paleoconservative]]s and [[National conservatism|National conservatives]] are conservative ideologies that emphasize and support nationalism the strongest. [[Euroskepticism]] mainly is a regional form of nationalism.
==Globalism==
==Globalism==
{{See also|Globalism}}
{{See also|Globalism}}
Globalism is a [[liberal]] and [[authoritarian]] desire for a "one world" view that rejects the role of sovereign nations in protecting values and encouraging productivity. Globalism is anti-[[America]]n in encouraging Americans to adopt a "world view" rather than an "American view." The ultimate goal of globalism is the eventual unification of humanity under a [[one-world government]].
Globalists oppose [[nationalism]], [[national sovereignty]], and [[self-governance]]. Instead, they favor [[open borders]], [[free trade]], [[H-1B visas]], interventionism, foreign aid, and changing the [[U.S. Constitution]]. They oppose strong border security and the building of [[border wall]]s. Globalists can come from several political leanings, from the far-left to those considered on the right-of-center.<ref>Leahy, Michael Patrick (October 31, 2017). [http://www.breitbart.com/big-government/2017/10/31/paul-singer-and-george-soros-billionaire-bookends-of-globalist-opposition-to-trump-agenda/ Paul Singer and George Soros: Billionaire Bookends of Globalist Opposition to Trump Agenda]. ''Breitbart News''. Retrieved November 1, 2017.</ref>
Liberals support globalism because it leads to centralized power, thereby providing liberals with an easier way to gain control. Liberals can more easily persuade a handful of people in centralized government to rule in their favor than convince everyone of their agenda in a decentralized form of government.
===War on Sovereignty===
===War on Sovereignty===
{{See also|War on Sovereignty|One-world government}}
{{See also|War on Sovereignty|One-world government}}
Doing away with national sovereignty and eventually creating a one-world government is an ultimate goal of globalists. They believe in [[Idea of Progress|the concept that humanity is progressing for the better]], and they want to create a [[utopia]] where humanity is unified and where there are no wars, conflicts, or borders (cultural and national). Supranational organizations such as the [[United Nations]], [[European Union]], [[World Trade Organization]], and the [[Paris climate agreement]], appear to be the forerunners to a complete one-world government. All these organizations are supported by liberals. A one-world government is the epitome of [[big government]].
While many of those who either disbelieve or deny the existence of a "War on Sovereignty" imagine it as a very speedy attempt to instantly unite the world into a global government, those who are actively pushing for a one-world government are pursuing a relatively longsuffering strategy that will slowly merge all the countries of the world into each other prior to the official establishment of any world government. They believe this strategy to be the only way it can be successfully achieved. Zbigniew Brzezinski, an Obama advisor and member of the [[Council on Foreign Relations]] and [[Trilateral Commission]], admitted this, stating that "we cannot leap into world government in one quick step. The precondition for genuine globalization is progressive regionalization."<ref name="Perloff2009">Perloff, James (July 23, 2009). [https://www.thenewamerican.com/usnews/foreign-policy/item/1213-council-on-foreign-relations Council On Foreign Relations]. ''The New American''. Retrieved November 27, 2017.</ref> Organizations such as the EU and NAFTA are examples of this "progressive regionalization."<ref name="Perloff2009"/>
Additionally, Richard N. Gardner, a former State Department official, wrote in 1974 that a world government could not be established in one step. Rather, he argued that "in short, the ‘house of world order’ will have to be built from the bottom up rather than from the top down," and that "an end run around national sovereignty, eroding it piece by piece, will accomplish much more than the old fashioned assault."<ref>McManus, John F. (July 17, 2009). [https://www.thenewamerican.com/usnews/politics/item/2666-hillary-clinton-lets-cfr-cat-out-of-the-bag Hillary Clinton Lets CFR Cat Out of the Bag]. ''The New American''. Retrieved December 31, 2017.</ref><ref name="DeepState2017">Newman, Alex (October 30, 2017). [https://www.thenewamerican.com/usnews/constitution/item/27251-deep-state-behind-the-deep-state-cfr-trilaterals-bilderberg Deep State Behind the Deep State: CFR, Trilaterals, Bilderberg]. ''The New American''. Retrieved December 21, 2017.</ref> Gardner's strategy has been fully adopted by globalists, and international organizations such as the [[World Bank]], [[International Monetary Fund]], World Trade Organization, Paris climate agreement, and the numerous disarmament treaties are all examples of this strategy in action – eroding sovereignty bit by bit until all the countries of the world are so integrated by the complicated web of international organizations and treaties that the official establishment of a world government can be accomplished seamlessly and would rather be a mere recognition of ''de facto'' reality.
Globalists also have used the mass migration, such as the [[European migrant crisis]] incident, to advance their goal. As mass migration puts large numbers of people from certain locations into another country with different values, it causes much disruption, and this is able to reduce national pride and make the transition to a global world order relatively seamless.
==References==
==References==