of its policy recommendations. This is a really high percentage, considering that Reagan adopted only 49% of its agenda.[https://www.nytimes.com/2018/01/22/us/politics/heritage-foundation-agenda-trump-conservatives.html][http://www.washingtonexaminer.com/heritage-donald-trump-has-achieved-more-than-ronald-reagan-in-first-year/article/2646849][https://www.westernjournal.com/conservative-heritage-foundation-rates-first-year-trump-admin-even-better-reagans/] Looking at [https://www.scribd.com/document/369820462/Mandate-for-Leadership-Policy-Recommendations Heritage's list of policy recommendations], they seem like conservative policies, so if Trump is following them, it most likely is a good thing. Heritage seems to be skeptical of international organizations, based on the list, which is good. | of its policy recommendations. This is a really high percentage, considering that Reagan adopted only 49% of its agenda.[https://www.nytimes.com/2018/01/22/us/politics/heritage-foundation-agenda-trump-conservatives.html][http://www.washingtonexaminer.com/heritage-donald-trump-has-achieved-more-than-ronald-reagan-in-first-year/article/2646849][https://www.westernjournal.com/conservative-heritage-foundation-rates-first-year-trump-admin-even-better-reagans/] Looking at [https://www.scribd.com/document/369820462/Mandate-for-Leadership-Policy-Recommendations Heritage's list of policy recommendations], they seem like conservative policies, so if Trump is following them, it most likely is a good thing. Heritage seems to be skeptical of international organizations, based on the list, which is good. |