| Line 2: |
Line 2: |
| | '''Liberal logic''' is a term used to describe arguments made by some [[liberal]]s that may appear logical, but are actually nonsensical. Here are more than 100 examples: | | '''Liberal logic''' is a term used to describe arguments made by some [[liberal]]s that may appear logical, but are actually nonsensical. Here are more than 100 examples: |
| | | | |
| − | # Claim that mass ownership of the largely defensive weapon of [[gun]] does not reduce crime
| |
| | # Welcome [[transgender|gender-confused]] males competing in girls' and women's sports, despite the unfair advantage granted to those males. | | # Welcome [[transgender|gender-confused]] males competing in girls' and women's sports, despite the unfair advantage granted to those males. |
| | # If a crime is committed against a member of a predominantly [[Democrat]] group, then it's a "[[hate crime]]"; if committed against a member of a mostly [[Republican]] group, then it is not. | | # If a crime is committed against a member of a predominantly [[Democrat]] group, then it's a "[[hate crime]]"; if committed against a member of a mostly [[Republican]] group, then it is not. |
| Line 11: |
Line 10: |
| | # Claim something is true merely because a (nearly bankrupt) newspaper said so (see [[appeal to authority]]) | | # Claim something is true merely because a (nearly bankrupt) newspaper said so (see [[appeal to authority]]) |
| | # [[Obama]], [[Obama's Religion|whose statements and activities are]] [[Islam]]ic and does not attend church, is somehow a "Christian" while [[Thomas Jefferson]], a regular churchgoer, was "not a Christian". | | # [[Obama]], [[Obama's Religion|whose statements and activities are]] [[Islam]]ic and does not attend church, is somehow a "Christian" while [[Thomas Jefferson]], a regular churchgoer, was "not a Christian". |
| | + | # Claim that mass ownership of the largely defensive weapon of [[gun]] 7does not reduce crime |
| | # Assuming what is to be proved, as in implausibly assuming that [[radioactive decay]] has somehow been constant in order to claim that the Earth is old. | | # Assuming what is to be proved, as in implausibly assuming that [[radioactive decay]] has somehow been constant in order to claim that the Earth is old. |
| | # Claim that liberals' viewpoints are being "censored", while actually they are the ones censoring their opponents. | | # Claim that liberals' viewpoints are being "censored", while actually they are the ones censoring their opponents. |